lets go back to the basics shall we. the job of the ball boy is to get the ball and give it to a player. this asshole run for the ball even though he could see the player was going to get. then as the player approached him, he bent over holding the ball under his body. when the player went to grab it off him. he fell to the ground and held the ball under him.
you only saw thew video from this point on wards. one cannot help but as why the television media cut the video the way they did. television media has form regarding this matter. when the police on horses attacked the striking workers, the workers threw sticks and stones to the police. however in the news the order was switched round. they showed the striking workers throwing the sticks and stones at the police and then showed the police charging at the workers. so be that as it may it just goes to show what an ass you are too just like the ball boy.
Lordo wrote:i see this a bigger problem then i realised.
lets go back to the basics shall we. the job of the ball boy is to get the ball and give it to a player. this asshole run for the ball even though he could see the player was going to get. then as the player approached him, he bent over holding the ball under his body. when the player went to grab it off him. he fell to the ground and held the ball under him.
you only saw thew video from this point on wards. one cannot help but as why the television media cut the video the way they did. television media has form regarding this matter. when the police on horses attacked the striking workers, the workers threw sticks and stones to the police. however in the news the order was switched round. they showed the striking workers throwing the sticks and stones at the police and then showed the police charging at the workers. so be that as it may it just goes to show what an ass you are too just like the ball boy.
The biggest problem you have is, that you are inherently an dishonest person which you have shown your colours here on the forum for few years now, that even when the evidence is black and white in front of you, you try to defend the indefensible. Must be something you have picked up in the north over the years.
OK, lets get back to the basics, if you insist, but you still going to lose.
The ball boy tried to get the ball to give it to the goalkeeper, because it was a goal kick, was it not? It had nothing to do with the Chelsea player getting the ball, because it was not his job, was it? I can understand if it was a Chelsea corner with only few seconds left that Chelsea player wanted to retrieve the ball himself, but it was a goal kick for god sake. The goal keeper could have easily wasted more time taking the goal kick than the ball boy ever could ordinarily. In the first place, the Chelsea player did not even give the ball boy a chance to pick the ball up, because he kicked the ball from the boy's hand as he pushed him down on top of the ball, and then he kicked him in the guts. Just listen to the announcer as he saw the replay starting at 45 seconds of the video. If you needed more proof of the Chelsea player's wrong doings, he got the Red Card, did he not? I can't believe how corrupt you really are. No wonder you are accused of having stolen GCs properties in the north. It's all normal for you to be morally corrupted, I'm sure.
Here, watch it one more time, but this time wearing your glasses and hearing aid turned on.
Lordo wrote:i see this a bigger problem then i realised.
lets go back to the basics shall we. the job of the ball boy is to get the ball and give it to a player. this asshole run for the ball even though he could see the player was going to get. then as the player approached him, he bent over holding the ball under his body. when the player went to grab it off him. he fell to the ground and held the ball under him.
you only saw thew video from this point on wards. one cannot help but as why the television media cut the video the way they did. television media has form regarding this matter. when the police on horses attacked the striking workers, the workers threw sticks and stones to the police. however in the news the order was switched round. they showed the striking workers throwing the sticks and stones at the police and then showed the police charging at the workers. so be that as it may it just goes to show what an ass you are too just like the ball boy.
The biggest problem you have is, that you are inherently an dishonest person which you have shown your colours here on the forum for few years now, that even when the evidence is black and white in front of you, you try to defend the indefensible. Must be something you have picked up in the north over the years.
OK, lets get back to the basics, if you insist, but you still going to lose.
The ball boy tried to get the ball to give it to the goalkeeper, because it was a goal kick, was it not? It had nothing to do with the Chelsea player getting the ball, because it was not his job, was it? I can understand if it was a Chelsea corner with only few seconds left that Chelsea player wanted to retrieve the ball himself, but it was a goal kick for god sake. The goal keeper could have easily wasted more time taking the goal kick than the ball boy ever could ordinarily. In the first place, the Chelsea player did not even give the ball boy a chance to pick the ball up, because he kicked the ball from the boy's hand as he pushed him down on top of the ball, and then he kicked him in the guts. Just listen to the announcer as he saw the replay starting at 45 seconds of the video. If you needed more proof of the Chelsea player's wrong doings, he got the Red Card, did he not? I can't believe how corrupt you really are. No wonder you are accused of having stolen GCs properties in the north. It's all normal for you to be morally corrupted, I'm sure.
Here, watch it one more time, but this time wearing your glasses and hearing aid turned on.
my god, this greek fella ,kikapu who pretends he is turkish ( as if he has fooled anyone,the fool) he is an expert in virtually everything from aviation to football. you are missing the point son. yes he would have given the ball to the keeper , eventually , it was his job to do so , but by his own admission he intended to waste time. he is the 17 year old son of a very rich man who had no right to hold on to the ball. as soon as a player approached him for the ball he had to hand it over not act like rich petulant child, much like you do. a few of your favourite icons, retard
Let me get this straight Kikapu accuses a player of the team he SUPPORTS (Chelsea) that he acted in a violent manner against a 17 year old And you all accuse Kikapu that it was the fault of the 17 yo on the first place. So assuming you lordo and kuntish are right, then what do you really want to PROVE?
That football is not a sport that causes all sorts of violence? That football is not a sport that includes all sorts of dirty business?
Kikapooo is an ass. if he cant see not just a ball boy but a team cheat in game of sport by time wasting continuosly without so much as word from the ref than that makes him an ass. the match was fixed. simple but obviously not as simple so that my simple friend could understand it.
but gues what finally the lid is off. games have been fixed. the refs have take brimes in hundreds of games. of course your friend had so much faith in the referee. but now i now he suports chelsea he is a bigger fool than i took him for. what an ass. wow. thats made my day.