Viewpoint wrote:Im in the TRNC.
I know you were in TrashNcan
My question was how come you two were absent at exactly the same hours? Did you go to some office together to get further instructions?
Viewpoint wrote:Im in the TRNC.
boulio wrote:VP the problem however is how much land returned for recognition.in my opinion it would need to be more than the ap5.Also what about properties in the north and south?compenstion at todays prices?what about the security aspect of a new deal?your thoughts would be appreciated.
boulio wrote:gentlemen its just a hypothetical question to vp,however dont be so certain everyone wants to live with each other.or share things for that matte ie govt,land etc etc.
Kikapu wrote:
There are many reasons as to why the TCs cannot claim these properties as if you didn't know. Here are few.
1. Many of the original owners, parents/grand parents are dead with the deeds still in their names.
2. The heirs to the parents/grand parents property have not gone trough probate in the RoC in order to have their parents/grand parents property to be placed in their names, therefore the future heirs cannot take any property in the south belonging to their parents/grand parents.
3. Many of the TCs gave their parents/grand parents deeds to their property in the south to the "trnc" (Turkey) in order to receive stolen GCs property in the north and are now caught in a trap of becoming "Double Dipping", which the north's authorities (Turkey) will not take it too kindly if the TCs attempted to get their (parents/grand parents) properties in the south, even if they could, because once they have received stolen GC properties in the north, they have voluntarily have given up their rights to those properties in the south, even though the RoC does not recognise it, but the TCs in the north will be punished severely by the "trnc" if they dared "Double Dipping". They will not be able to return back to the north for the threat of being prosecuted.
4. Any TC who were in Cyprus in 1974 at the time of the invasion by Turkey are not eligible to have their properties in the south returned to them by the RoC until a settlement is reached, even if the heirs had gone through probate in the RoC of their parents/grand parents properties. Only those TCs who were not in Cyprus in 1974 at the time of the Turkish invasion can have their parents/grand parents properties returned once they have gone trough probate or that they were the sole heirs which does not require probate but documents to satisfy the court in the RoC that he/she is the sole heir.
CopperLine wrote:Recognition is not something decided by GCs, although GCs will surely not recognise the state in the north. Each state across the world may decide for itself whether or not to recognise the TRNC. It is a political decision and not a legally determined decision. Sure there are decisions which are more or less likely to encourage or discourage states from extending recognition, such as Security Council resolutions, but the UNSC does not in itself define what is legal or unlawful.
The basic story is that GCS have been very effective in ensuring that the ball doesn't even start rolling, having moved as far as recognition from one state, Turkey. But if the ball were to restart and gain momentum then there is little that the RoC could do to stop it. That is why RoC's entry into the EU, without the acquis for the north was critical.
In direct response to VP the answer is that there is no magic or critical number for recognition. See the Palestine and Kosovo cases for very different results from very different numbers (and very different processes).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests