bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bills proposals are not acceptable, especially scraping of the guarantees with no back up.
So you're rejecting a BBF...???
Why can only GCs do that?
bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bills proposals are not acceptable, especially scraping of the guarantees with no back up.
So you're rejecting a BBF...???
Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bills proposals are not acceptable, especially scraping of the guarantees with no back up.
So you're rejecting a BBF...???
Why can only GCs do that?
Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bills proposals are not acceptable, especially scraping of the guarantees with no back up.
So you're rejecting a BBF...???
Why can only GCs do that?
You can do it too. The GC's here can now also bleat on and on because you said no to unification. You said no to the CYFORUM plan in 2013 and they said yes. It's the same logic you use with the AP.
Non recognition is the answer.
repulsewarrior wrote:...we can take it that vp is a wind-up toy, without a mind of his own, no Cypriot, not Turkish, just a "Turk" wannabe.
Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bills proposals are not acceptable, especially scraping of the guarantees with no back up.
So you're rejecting a BBF...???
Why can only GCs do that?
You can do it too. The GC's here can now also bleat on and on because you said no to unification. You said no to the CYFORUM plan in 2013 and they said yes. It's the same logic you use with the AP.
Non recognition is the answer.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Very very disappointed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest