Lordo wrote:where is the hypocracy me ed. personal choice of one individual only effecting themselves is one thing and believing in human rights of a nation to choose what ever it suits herself is another. i see no hypocracy there. if the rule of roc is to provide free healthcare to citizens below the poverty line and then retracts this service to the citizens north of the green line then how can this be explained. It is in the constitution that tcs pay to the tc authorities and gcs to gc authorities. there is nothing in the constitution that one cannot make use of the services of the other. now considering that the economic suffocation directly results in the below poverty standard of living north of thre green line and the roc is also directly responsible for the economic suffocation on account that there are gc property being used in the north whilst at the same time gcs are using tc properties in the south which are actually greater in value than the gc lands in the north i do believe that the hypocricy mainly manifests itself in the south of the green line not that there is none in the north of the line.
my question still remains. we have a tc family who live in the north whos father was murdered by the roc police. now how will it look when this service is withdrawn from this family and many other families.
first live in a civilised scociety before you start criticising others. when the foundation is rotten the build will collapse sonner ot later. have a closer look at the roc foundations.
Lordo,
I for once agree with your statement
"when the foundation is rotten the build will collapse sooner or later. have a closer look at the roc foundations", and looking at the original RoC constitution, yes it is rotten and of course collapsed in 1963.
However, you do need to come into the real world.
Firstly, the TCs current predicament is overwhelmingly Turkeys fault and whilst TCs welcomed Turkeys invasion in 1974, 38 years of successive Turkish policy and interference has been disastrous for TCs but of great benefit for Turkish and foreign nationals.
Secondly, land in the north isn't notionally cheaper than the land in the south, it's under military occupation. So when making comparisons you should really assume how much the land would be worth post-settlement and the land under military occupation would be worth as much, if not more than land in the south.