Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Maximus** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:51 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Yes, yes, yes VP... but can you answer the question posed by another uncouth and ignorant peasant, who asked...

Errr.... VP .... How have the UN defined "political equality" in the past ...???

Go on bill tell us all or even better provide a link.

If you cant then you have just been spilling beans and waffles.

by **bill cobbett** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:07 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Yes, yes, yes VP... but can you answer the question posed by another uncouth and ignorant peasant, who asked...

Errr.... VP .... How have the UN defined "political equality" in the past ...???

Go on bill tell us all or even better provide a link.

Well given you go on and on and on etc etc about it so much VP, so much so that you're an obvious expert in the matter... you tell us...

How have the UN defined "political equality" in the past ...???

by **Viewpoint** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:11 pm

Maximus wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Maximus wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Maximus wrote:I am cool, I find you comical and completely derranged VP,

Please stop parroting my words back to me though, you are starting to creep me out.

And I find you uncouth, ignorant and peasant like. You and people like are the reason why we will and should never unite.

but there is like, a 75-80% chance that you are not even Cypriot. I doubt that you are.

You have proven my point about you being uncouth, I am a Turkish Cypriot but what if I was Turkish what difference would it make? why are you being racist?

Its a fact (75-80% likely that you are not Cypriot) which I / you cannot prove from here actually (whether you are or are not). The difference is that you should have absolutely no say on the matter of Cyprus. Turkey has to resettle them and you within her internationally recognized border.

so you see VP, you should be thanking me, I am thinking about your well being, I am thinking about your potential loss. I do not want you to be out of pocket in the process. It will all be taken care of by Turkey. I know that you will prefer it there, as a majority, in your domain, you will thrive on your economic prosperity. you are welcome back to Cyprus for a holiday, you can apply for a working visa, you can be my friend and I can be your friend and we can both help each other. But this must be done achieved through the right circumstances, the injustices must be recognized and rectified.

Sorry to disappoint you but Im 100% Turkish Cypriot so I am not going nowhere which blows your little dream out of the water really. Now concentrate on the fact that you have to share Cyprus with an equal partner the TCs.

by **bill cobbett** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:26 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
Sorry to disappoint you but Im 100% Turkish Cypriot so I am not going nowhere which blows your little dream out of the water really. Now concentrate on the fact that you have to share Cyprus with an equal partner the TCs.

You refer to it again so you have to be asked again VP ... to give us the UN's views on equal partnership please.... just how has the UN better defined this...???

by **Maximus** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:04 pm

Maximus better defines this as two zones which have an equal status. These two zones will make up a single international personality. Its a miniature EU aquis for Cyprus, but neither of the two zones will have independent sovereignty, its only two zones for domestic political matters. In time, the zones will become a fad. Cyprus as a whole will be governed democratically.

In VP's definition, Cyprus would have the personality of a schizophrenic, no democracy and maybe either sharia law or civil war later on down the line.

by **bill cobbett** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:16 pm

Maximus wrote:Maximus better defines this as two zones which have an equal status. These two zones will make up a single international personality. Its a miniature EU aquis for Cyprus, with no international recognition for each of the two zones.

In VP's definition, Cyprus would have the personality of a schizophrenic, no democracy and maybe either sharia law or civil war later on down the line.

That's about it Maxi for one part of the political power equation, the zonal powers ... 2 zones of equal status, equal in their powers at the zonal level for zonal affairs. The regional powers of one zone mirrored in the other zone.

by **Maximus** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:27 pm

I modified the originate quote to be a bit more accurate in my definition,

by **repulsewarrior** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:29 pm

bill cobbett wrote:
Maximus wrote:Maximus better defines this as two zones which have an equal status. These two zones will make up a single international personality. Its a miniature EU aquis for Cyprus, with no international recognition for each of the two zones.

In VP's definition, Cyprus would have the personality of a schizophrenic, no democracy and maybe either sharia law or civil war later on down the line.

That's about it Maxi for one part of the political power equation, the zonal powers ... 2 zones of equal status, equal in their powers at the zonal level for zonal affairs. The regional powers of one zone mirrored in the other zone.

...now bill. have you been reading my manifesto?

by **Viewpoint** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:49 pm

Maximus wrote:Maximus better defines this as two zones which have an equal status. These two zones will make up a single international personality. Its a miniature EU aquis for Cyprus, but neither of the two zones will have independent sovereignty, its only two zones for domestic political matters.

Exactly an equal partnership.

by **repulsewarrior** » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:59 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
Maximus wrote:Maximus better defines this as two zones which have an equal status. These two zones will make up a single international personality. Its a miniature EU aquis for Cyprus, but neither of the two zones will have independent sovereignty, its only two zones for domestic political matters.

Exactly an equal partnership.

...so, where is the Greek Constituency?