Jackos wrote:but I am unwilling to assume the story of the three little pigs is true.
You picked the story. I'm using the fictitious story to make a logical argument. In any case we don't have any eye-witnesses.
there's a reason why i chose a fairytale, jackos... to make my argument. but u missed it.
Jackos wrote:what if we assume X and Y both reported the pigs flying, am i to assume u would accept that fact also?
What if archaeologists were to find the remains of pre-historic pig with wings? Do you believe in dinosaurs?
this is getting silly.
Jackos wrote:in any event, scenario (a) and (b) are mutually exclusive, because in (a) both pigs escape the wolf by entering the third pig's house (the one made of brick)... so they can't have been eaten by the wolf because, as much as he huffed and puffed, he could not blow the house down.
Your assuming that I know the rest of the story.
yes i did. forgive me. i assumed u were well versed in tales of this nature.