Cyprus-Forum.com

by **GreekIslandGirl** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:41 am

If it wasn't for the Russians and Putin's Nobel Price-winning aversion of another world war, then Cyprus would have been turned into dust by the warmongering Brits and Americans this weekend.

Even so, "great" Britain can't wait to start playing with its new toys which it has nevertheless dispatched to Cyprus in readiness to start blowing up the Middle East (again) ...

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/429 ... -gas-fears

The sooner the EU disbands Britain's weapons of mass destruction, loaded up in Cyprus' pure and pleasant land, the better.

by **Paphitis** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:19 am

You need to seek some help because you have lost touch with reality I am afraid!

Please seek help...

by **yialousa1971** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:34 am

Paphitis wrote:You need to seek some help because you have lost touch with reality I am afraid!

Please seek help...

You're mad. :shock:

by **Paphitis** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 1:45 am

yialousa1971 wrote:
Paphitis wrote:You need to seek some help because you have lost touch with reality I am afraid!

Please seek help...

You're mad.

I'm just really concerned for old mate who thinks Russia averted a world war and saved Cyprus from being blown to smitherines!

by **supporttheunderdog** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:42 am

GreekIslandGirl wrote:If it wasn't for the Russians and Putin's Nobel Price-winning aversion of another world war, then Cyprus would have been turned into dust by the warmongering Brits and Americans this weekend.

Even so, "great" Britain can't wait to start playing with its new toys which it has nevertheless dispatched to Cyprus in readiness to start blowing up the Middle East (again) ...

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/429 ... -gas-fears

The sooner the EU disbands Britain's weapons of mass destruction, loaded up in Cyprus' pure and pleasant land, the better.

More delusional comments from "g"IG who does not appear to have read the article properly.

There is no evidence at all any WMD have been despatched to Cyprus, in the Express Item that you posted. All they have sent is personnel trained to deal with any attack that may be launched by others using such weapons against British Troops.

Indeed Britain apparently has had no chemical or biological weapons since 1956, let to deploy to Cyprus, when apparently the then Conservative Government denounced the use of and ordered the destruction of chemical and biological weapons. Further In 1975 the then labour Government signed the Biological weapomns Convention and in 1996 Britain ratified the Chemical Weapons convention.

These Chemical and biological WMD are just as imaginary in the mind of "g"IG as they were in the minds of Bush and Blair before starting the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

However where it is known that Protaganists in a nearby conflict possess chemical weapons (and Syria is not a party to the convention, nor are the rebels) and they are known to have been used by at least one of the parties it is prudent to employ people to assist in dealing with these weapons if they deployed against one...

by **GreekIslandGirl** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:57 am

The "delusional" is the person who believes Britain maintains two of the most costly Military Bases in Cyprus but doesn't actually keep any weapons there. :roll:

Britain doesn't deny keeping weapons of mass destruction in the Bases - and with a possible "Yes" vote to Independence by Scotland, guess where the hot tridents etc are likely to go ...

by **supporttheunderdog** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:06 am

Oh yes they have weapons, I passed through the SBA last weeks and there a couple of guys with personal weaponry, just as one sees the CNG have, but WMD?

Britain never says where its nuclear weaponry may be deployed: they neither confirm nor deny so nothing (except in your deluded mind) can be read into Britian not denying where nuclear weapons may or may not be held.

There is no evidence that any WMD are in Cyprus and the Article you posted does not support that theory.

by **GreekIslandGirl** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:11 am

How does the article detract from what is currently stored at the Bases? The article is just the latest in the influx of more weapons (and that includes personnel) of mass (and that means plenty) destruction (and that means anything that destroys).

Go on supporting the use of the military bases whilst pretending they should be moved elsewhere. You're on shaky ground.

by **supporttheunderdog** » Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:11 pm

GreekIslandGirl wrote:How does the article detract from what is currently stored at the Bases? The article is just the latest in the influx of more weapons (and that includes personnel) of mass (and that means plenty) destruction (and that means anything that destroys).

Go on supporting the use of the military bases whilst pretending they should be moved elsewhere. You're on shaky ground.

I have made it plain that I support the abolition of the SBA as a part of a comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus Problem.

I have also made it plain I do not support any attack on Syria by British or US forces. whether from the bases or elsewhere.

Obama is playing a dangerous game.