Cyprus-Forum.com

[Viewpoint]

And Maxi your opinions instigate the same " repugnant and disgraceful" feelings in us, your despot attitude lacks any form of understanding and your intelligence is none existent.

[Maximus]

I tell the truth and you just cant handle the truth, so you put up a mirror and say that my comments are repugnant and disgraceful. wake up

You try to blow smoke up everyones arse instead, but the majority of TC's and Turkish culture by large lives in a vaccum encompassed by wicked lies.

[Kikapu]

sometimes I think you are from mars kickapu.

in 1963 the constitution was there. did it stop 10,000 greek soldiers enter cyprus illegally or did it stop yorgadjis arm 5000 men. which part of the constitution allowed for that

I really wish you thought a little before you posted. lets face it the constitution is worth the paper it is written on and only if it is soft enough to have dual purpose.

you really think you are so clever
lan sen garacahelsin lan.

Surely you are not talking about the so called undemocratic and racist constitution that was put together by UK, Greece and Turkey for the RoC to cause ethnic problems between Cypriots, just so they can divide Cyprus between themselves, are you?

thats the one that was so racist it excluded enosis with greece and taksim with turkey. i mean how racist can one get. and yet you are saying it was created to decide cyprus. it was in black white in the constitution.

what do you think about roc ms unanimously voting for enosis in 67. thats how much they wanted to make the new constitution work. you really need some help my friend. and i mean real help with a dr.

i have one question for you though. are you for enosis or not/ yes or no. dont beat about the bush you hear.

Why don't you first rephrase your question to include Taksim also before I answer it!

As for the rest of your post, stop cherry picking of events and see the whole picture instead.

So, you are saying that Turkey signed to exclude Taksim from the constitution for Cyprus but is now occupying 3rd of the island with it's Illegal Aliens. So what you are saying is, I'm right.. thanks

It seems like, only Greece did not manage to take part of Cyprus, since the UK still have parts of Cyprus also.

the problem is worse then i first realised. i am so glad you are finding this situation so funny. take your time and answer the question. it is not a difficult one to answer but your refusal to answer it speaks volumes. at least you could have repeated your best friends usual garbage which is the right of the greek cypriots to self determination, which i actually support. but if it is enosis then they can take their part of the island to mars if they wish. no objections from me.

no cherry picking my friend even a 5 year old can grasp the situation. by excluding taksim in the 1960 agreement turkey made her intention of the independence of cyprus crystal clear. by also excluding it from 1972 dengtash/clerides agreement, she confirmed her intention. why would makarios object to enosis being excluded and all the people should be able to go back to their homes in 1972. only one reason the aphrodite two plan had not been implemented yet. you aware of this plan of grivas in 1967 are you. i suspect not.

why are they occupying a third of the island is very simple. after 37 years we still only have a ceasefire and no peace agreement. poll the turkish cypriots and exclude so called settlers and see if you can find more than 5% which agree with turkish troops leaving before an agreement. the voting that takes place every 5 years makes this very clear. even a blind man can see this.

no peace no troops out. peace and all troops out including the cypriot eoga national guard and their reservists stripped of their arms.

The fact that you do not want to rephrase your question so that I can answer it fully, speaks volumes. I have told you before Lordo, that I am 5 steps ahead of you at all times with your attempts to trap me with your infantile questions.

I was laughing at you and not the situation. By you trying to justify what Turkey has done by illegally occupying our country when you believed Turkey agreed not to allow any form of Taksim or Enosis, that's what exactly she has done, because the 1960 constitution was designed to partition Cyprus 3 ways between Greece, Turkey and UK. Without that constitution, Turkey would not have had an excuse to invade Cyprus. Since the invasion, Turkey has no reason to solve the Cyprus problem, because it would mean for her to leave Cyprus for Cypriots, unless of course you still believe the Annan Plan plan was a peace plan that meant Turkey was going to wash her hands of Cyprus once and for all, which even a 5 year old does not believe that to be the case.

You don't really believe the TCs are deciding their future in the north regarding Turkish Troops and the settlers, are you? There is no such thing as democracy in the north, not when the Illegal Alien Anatolians are outvoting the TCs, just because your morally corrupt leaders in the north sold the TCs votes to Turkey for lining their own pockets with money from Turkey. The only thing the TCs have anything to show for, is the stolen GC properties and land they occupy, having first given their legally owned deeds for their properties in the south to their morally corrupted leaders to do what they wish with them in exchange for stolen GC properties, which no one in the world recognises, except for Turkey of course. Just one more illegal act committed by Turkey against ALL Cypriots.

[Maximus]

Turkish PM accuses Israel of ethnic cleansing
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkis ... sCatID=338

Turkey is guilty for ethnic cleansing. Wake up.

[Viewpoint]

Turkish PM accuses Israel of ethnic cleansing
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkis ... sCatID=338

Turkey is guilty for ethnic cleansing. Wake up.

No mention of it in this piece, what are you refereing to?

[Maximus]

Turkish PM accuses Israel of ethnic cleansing
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkis ... sCatID=338

Turkey is guilty for ethnic cleansing. Wake up.

No mention of it in this piece, what are you refereing to?

God bless you.

[Viewpoint]

Turkish PM accuses Israel of ethnic cleansing
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkis ... sCatID=338

Turkey is guilty for ethnic cleansing. Wake up.

No mention of it in this piece, what are you refereing to?

God bless you.

Are you a priest?

[Lordo]

for kikapu.


if only i could read your mind and know what is the question you want me to ask. you are not even a good politican never mind 5 steps agead. a good politician forgets about the question he is asked and asks his own question and then answers it.

Now the question is very simple do you support enosis or not. really how many ways are there of asking such a question. why do you find it so hard to say ney or yey.

when it comes to the intention of turkey from 1960 to 1974 it is clear as can be. there was to be no taksim and no enosis. now which bit of this statement do you not understand and how do you then interpreted this statement to mean that there must be 3 way taksim. no taksim can only mean no taksim.

in 64 kucuk senior went to inonu and told him that they cannot live with gcs. inonu replied go back and make peace with the gc. a person is allowed to be biased to an opinion but in the face of real facts he looks stupid.

if i may ask you another question. is the colour of milk black or white. would you like it rephrased my friend.

after 74 i grant you turkish policy changed.