Cyprus-Forum.com

by **kimon07** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:13 pm

Lordo wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Is someone with taramasalata for brains really posting verses from the Bible in support of murder by lynch-mob...???

(anyone got any pepto-bismol...?)

you have hit the nail on the head my friend. these people are what is commonly known as two headed revionists. they make it up as they go along. you got an objection to that. how dare you sir, how very dare you, you little charlou upstart that you are. how very dare you.

What did I tell you Bill?

by **bill cobbett** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:14 pm

For those with tzaziki between the ears...

There is nothing but respect towards the just, noble and appropriate reactions of the People of CY to overthrow the Illegal Occupation by GB.

There is hatred towards anything to do with extra-judicial "justice".

by **yialousa1971** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:20 pm

bill cobbett wrote:For those with tzaziki between the ears...

There is nothing but respect towards the just, noble and appropriate reactions of the People of CY to overthrow the Illegal Occupation by GB.

There is hatred towards anything to do with extra-judicial "justice".

What a nasty little Goblin you are. :evil:

by **bill cobbett** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:22 pm

kimon07 wrote:
Lordo wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Is someone with taramasalata for brains really posting verses from the Bible in support of murder by lynch-mob...???

(anyone got any pepto-bismol...?)

you have hit the nail on the head my friend. these people are what is commonly known as two headed revionists. they make it up as they go along. you got an objection to that. how dare you sir, how very dare you, you little charlou upstart that you are. how very dare you.

What did I tell you Bill?

Kimon me dear join us in saying that a lot of what the people of CY of the time did under the leadership of eoka was right and just... 90% was ok, the resistance, the civil disobedience, the leafleting, the strikes and marches even as far as armed fighting against a much better armed enemy, that was all ok... but to support the murders of unarmed civilians by the likes of Simpson's gangs, for instance, was and remains very wrong.... imho

CYs don't make good terrorists file, they are Strugglers for Freedom.

by **supporttheunderdog** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:39 pm

Bill

I will join you in supporting the resistance, the civil disobedience, the leafleting, the strikes and marches....but not the terrorism

by **kimon07** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:43 pm

bill cobbett wrote:
kimon07 wrote:
Lordo wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Is someone with taramasalata for brains really posting verses from the Bible in support of murder by lynch-mob...???

(anyone got any pepto-bismol...?)

you have hit the nail on the head my friend. these people are what is commonly known as two headed revionists. they make it up as they go along. you got an objection to that. how dare you sir, how very dare you, you little charlou upstart that you are. how very dare you.

What did I tell you Bill?

Kimon me dear join us in saying that a lot of what the people of CY of the time did under the leadership of eoka was right and just... 90% was ok, the resistance, the civil disobedience, the leafleting, the strikes and marches even as far as armed fighting against a much better armed enemy, that was all ok... but to support the murders of unarmed civilians by the likes of Simpson's gangs, for instance, was and remains very wrong.... imho

CYs don't make good terrorists file, they are Strugglers for Freedom.

I will agree with 99% of your post. But now answer me this question: When someone informs on fighters and they are arrested tortured and killed (like in the cases of Afxendiou and Karaolis). When someone informs the enemy about the hide outs of the fighters etc. When someone informs about future operations to be undertaken and thus these operations are aborted or they fail. What do you do with such persons? Is the punishment of collaborators of the enemy legit or not?

by **kimon07** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:45 pm

supporttheunderdog wrote:Bill

I will join you in supporting the resistance, the civil disobedience, the leafleting, the strikes and marches....but not the terrorism

You forgot to mention bombarding the enemy with canisters full of ........roses!

by **supporttheunderdog** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:45 pm

kimon07 wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
kimon07 wrote:
Lordo wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Is someone with taramasalata for brains really posting verses from the Bible in support of murder by lynch-mob...???

(anyone got any pepto-bismol...?)

you have hit the nail on the head my friend. these people are what is commonly known as two headed revionists. they make it up as they go along. you got an objection to that. how dare you sir, how very dare you, you little charlou upstart that you are. how very dare you.

What did I tell you Bill?

Kimon me dear join us in saying that a lot of what the people of CY of the time did under the leadership of eoka was right and just... 90% was ok, the resistance, the civil disobedience, the leafleting, the strikes and marches even as far as armed fighting against a much better armed enemy, that was all ok... but to support the murders of unarmed civilians by the likes of Simpson's gangs, for instance, was and remains very wrong.... imho

CYs don't make good terrorists file, they are Strugglers for Freedom.

I will agree with 99% of your post. But now answer me this question: When someone informs on fighters and they are arrested tortured and killed (like in the cases of Afxendiou and Karaolis). When someone informs the enemy about the hide outs of the fighters etc. When someone informs about future operations to be undertaken and thus these operations are aborted or they fail. What do you do with such persons? Is the punishment of collaborators of the enemy legit or not?

Whether you like or not opposition to EOKA and/or supporting the then legitimate government of the British was a legitimate political point of view...

by **kimon07** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:33 pm

supporttheunderdog wrote:Whether you like or not opposition to EOKA and/or supporting the then legitimate government of the British was a legitimate political point of view...

Right. Exactly the opinion the Nazis and their collaborators had about the French, the Yugoslav and the Greek resistances during WW2. they were all terrorists to them. (Guess what: Unlike you, Golden Dawn don't think the Greek Resistance against the Nazis were terrorists.) :lol:

by **GreekIslandGirl** » Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:39 pm

bill cobbett wrote:For those with tzaziki between the ears...

There is nothing but respect towards the just, noble and appropriate reactions of the People of CY to overthrow the Illegal Occupation by GB.

There is hatred towards anything to do with extra-judicial "justice".

What EOKA did was ALL extra-judicial because our laws and government were ALL British Empire controlled-judicial - exactly what EOKA were fighting against. So how can YOU now decide what was and wasn't (in your learned eyes :roll:

) judicial and extra-judicial?????