Demonax wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:The point being that you roll out benchmarks to prove how wonderful iPads are - but when an iPad is shown to be woefully inadequate on another benchmark you claim that benchmarks are not important - then produce the original benchmark to show how wonderful iPads are!
Oh... and do you remember that you also said that the iPad Mini would be a great machine when it had the Retina screen? But now it is 'a really great machine'!
Consistency is important...
Grumpy, mate. The iPad Mini is a great machine without a retina screen. I've had the chance to check one out and if truth be told it was a fantastic machine. It would be a perfect machine for me with the retina screen because I do a lot of reading on my iPad and I've been spoilt by the stunning display on my iPad 3. But right now, it's a trade off. You can buy top of the range, high-spec iPad 4 with retina screen starting at 399 pounds. Or the very desirable and gorgeous iPad Mini at 269 pounds. It depends what you want and what your budget is.
I’m not in the market for an iPad right now as I've got an iPad 3 with retina screen. If somebody was looking for a tablet for casual use, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the iPad mini. It's smaller form factor has its advantages if you're prepared to forego the retina screen, larger size and extra performance of the iPad 3 or 4.
You can also get a cheaper Android tablet including some rather nasty-looking Chinese knock-offs. But personally they're not for me, for reasons I've mentioned before.
what's there to debate?
my galaxy S2 does a lot more than all the ipads and iphones combined...how is apple maps going?...how is flash going?...how does it feel looking at a flash site and all you see, well nothing?...