GreekIslandGirl wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:If you read it carefully and slowly you will realise that my only reference to vacuum was to explain his speed.
No it wasn't. You referred to sound in a vacuum whilst thinking you could explain sound emanating from his mouth...
cyprusgrump wrote: ... he was travelling so fast because he was in a virtual vacuum where there can be no sound anyway.....
(BTW - continually resorting to how you lost the plot by quoting my "Amazing!" aside above, just reinforces your suffering.
)
No, read it all again... It is only
you that had difficulty understanding his ability to be heard (in your 'amazing' comment) when he was travelling faster than the speed of sound...
Shortly after, this was posted: -
CBBB wrote:When did he actually travel faster than the speed of sound, as it is not a constant and depends on air density and temperature?
690mph is considered to be the speed of sound at sea level, I am sure he wasn't going that fast then!
To which I replied: -
cyprusgrump wrote:You're quite right...
It is a bit of a con really isn't it... he was travelling so fast because he was in a virtual vacuum where there can be no sound anyway....
Concorde used to cruise at 'twice the speed of sound' which was about 1,350mph so they must choose some arbitrary figure...
So you see, when you stop your nasty little habit of obfuscation and miss or partly quoting what other people have said it becomes perfectly clear that what you have been claiming all along is false.
There is simply no reference whatsoever to the sound coming from his mouth in that quote.