Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapoo again you totally misunderstand what is being said, a 2 state solution as in 2 different countries where the GCs can claim back their properties where physically possible or recieve compensation if their properties remain in the 25%. Why is you see no problem with forcing us to live under GC rule and not the other way around the GCs can move to the recognized TRNC get their land back and share the same rights as me, whats wrong with that?
I did not miss anything. I know when you talk about 2 state solution you mean 2 countries, hence your rejection of a True Federal Democratic system of 2 states.
In a Democratic Federal system the TCs will not be living under a GC rule you nincompoop, but under Federal laws and Federal constitution agreed on by all sides as part of settlement. I have already given you a plan how it would work. Each state will run their own states with their own laws, and if the north is a majority TCs, then they will run their own affairs withing the Federal laws guidelines. This would mean of course, that you cannot kick the GCs out and keep their properties under this system, but you will do just that in your idea of 2 country states system. Your intentions are well known as well as Turkey's.
Your sell out plan was exactly that it left us exposed to manipulation and exploitation gifting the whole island to the GCs on a plate, we have discussed this many times and once your real intentions had been exposed this plan was rejected. Now lets get this straight with 80% of the population being GCs and the open door of taking the necessary 1 seat required to rule the whole island we will not be under GC rule, your more stupid than I had intially thought. The text book "Federal laws and Federal constitution " "Democracy and Human Rights" you chant is what we cannot agree so how on earth do you think we can apply what we cant agree, it will be doomed to failure.
Why do you want to gift control of the whole island to the GCs? why are you against our guaranteed contribution in a federal structure? Why are you so against partition where it would be a clean start for all? Why is it that you think GCs are better than us? Why do you want them to have their own country and not us? And why do you want to force us to give up 100% of the island when all we want is to share 25% 75%, where neither side will be forced to put up with other or fear hidden agendas? We have to be honest neither side wants to unite as one country BBF with political equality is the compromise but all you want to do is give the Gcs a free hand to democratically do as they wish even unite with Greece, back to square one, were you part of the eoka terrorists?
You don't know what the hell you are talking about and I don't have the time to keep educating you.
I stand with all those who want to keep 100% of Cyprus for ALL Cypriots. Does that answer your question?
It was Denktash who agreed to a BBF with political equality in a Federal system, so blame Denktash and not me. Federal system is designed to join the 2 states at the hip so that there is no chance of partition or a cessation of one state from the Federal Union. The fact that you and Turkey want a Confederation system only shows where your true intentions are, as the case was with the Annan plan. You have 2 options, either the BBF as in Federation of 2 states north and south with full democracy and human Rights with EU principles for everyone, or a Unitary state, also with the above principles. In any case, forget about my plan from now on, because you were too slow to accept it and the GCs are not going to offer the Rotating Presidency in the future negotiations, so there goes your built in Veto Power. The EU is also never going to give any part of Cyprus to Turkey, not even 5%, let alone 25%, not with all that potential fuel sitting beneath the sea floor of the coast of Cyprus.