Papadopoulos has been a nationalist and will always be a nationalist. He is the opposite side of the same coin and you will find Denktash on the other side of the coin that bears the face of Papadopoulos one one side. Papadopoulos is no stranger to politics. He has been around since the 50's. He has written countless articles in newspapers and magazines. He is an exposed character. It is thus very easy to prove the fact that he is a sick nationalist. Christofias argued that "the man has changed" in order to convince the faithful to accept him as the party's candidate. Well, anyone that knows the history of AKEL can easy conclude that it is not Papadopoulos that has changed for the better but AKEL for the worse. Take the recent stance of Papadopoulos when he refuses flatly to ask for negotiations. He claims that since he gave his proposals to Anna it is up to the SG to convene a new round of talks. Talat, on the other hand is litterally just across the road and he stated that he is ready to meet Papadopoulos any time. Papadopoulos will not even have coffe with him, waiting rather for Kofee to call new negotiations. Why is this? Obviously the waiting game suits him fine because he knows that any negotiations will be based on the Annan Plan. He has no stomach for BBF and he prefers things to stay as they are. HE SAID SO, in Helsinki but the bigots that support him do not want to listen.
As for the influence of the church, I would like to point out that the church, besides offering to open the gates of parasites to the chosen ones (a no vote was a must, if you remember) it is also a financial giant, the biggest on the plantation. Anyone saying that this giant has no political clout must be daydreaming. Also, take a stroll in Nicosia and in most towns. A new church appears around almost every corner. They are huge, ugly buildings, that spoil the natural environment and make mockery of aesthetics.