In my view Big Mak made a big mistake in 1955 when he turned down Hardings' offer of internal self rule. It was not what he wanted but if he had accept it I think we could have had a very different position in Cyprus today.
Acceptance of the plan had the following potential benefits - He could have put in place a one-man-one vote political system which would have avoided the cumbersome arrangements later imposed in 1960 and the obvious obvious problems they caused.The need for the first evil A plane, the Acritas plan and all that flowed from it in 1964 could have been avoided. In particular the British and the Turkish speaking Cypriots would not have been thrown together and the Turks would have had less excuse to interfere since the issue of inter communal violence, except at the instigation of Turkish elements, would have been avoided. If there had been any objections from eg the TSC this would have placed the objectors in the wrong.
That is not to say Turkey would not have objected and tried to interfere but he could have called on British support against foreign interference by Eg Turkey, and made the Turkish Speaking Cypriots in to the bad boys if they tried to disturb the political system with demands for separate structures based on language.
Then after say two sets of elections to show that Cyprus functioned internally (over say a five year period) Big Mak could then have looked for independence. This would probably have been achievable without guarantee powers and possibly even avoiding the establishment of the SBA. There might have been British military presence but this probably could have been restricted to the actual military bases, without Sovereign Control over the nearby area. .
Then after independence he could have called for a vote on Enosis, and retired to his monastery..
Just one possible alternative-
However he rejected the idea. The rest is history.
This does not change my view that Enosis would have been a social and economic disaster for Cyprus and independance was the best way forward.