The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Asil Nadir found guilty.

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby Jerry » Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:07 pm

Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby bill cobbett » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:52 pm

Another date for the diaries...

27 September, when a hearing will be held for Prosecution Costs and Compensation Claims for the creditors.

Following that, there will be another hearing to consider Repayment of Legal Aid.

At all of these Nadir will have to provide details of assets and income... and woe betides anyone who tries to hoodwink the Courts.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby repulsewarrior » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:10 am

Hermes wrote:Are we nearer knowing why Nadir decided to abandon the pirate state to spend the rest of his life in a British prison?


crunch the numbers, he can still have a lovely retirement.
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 14254
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby Jerry » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:24 am

bill cobbett wrote:Another date for the diaries...

27 September, when a hearing will be held for Prosecution Costs and Compensation Claims for the creditors.

Following that, there will be another hearing to consider Repayment of Legal Aid.

At all of these Nadir will have to provide details of assets and income... and woe betides anyone who tries to hoodwink the Courts.



Criminals who pay back the proceeds of their crime may have their sentence reduced. Nadir may soon find out how much he is really worth to the family who are holding most of the loot on his behalf. Will they cough up or will they consider it a waste of money in the belief that he won't survive his prison sentence.
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby bill cobbett » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:30 am

repulsewarrior wrote:
Hermes wrote:Are we nearer knowing why Nadir decided to abandon the pirate state to spend the rest of his life in a British prison?


crunch the numbers, he can still have a lovely retirement.


Well, some sources are saying it was a massively miscalculated gamble to claim compensation from the GB Gov/SFO after proving his innocence... fuelled by a bizarre and obsessive sense of injustice with his treatment by the SFO. Here is The Telegraph on this...

...I understand another incentive was the prospect of a multi-million pound payout at the end of the trial. In the background to the criminal case, lawyers, PRs and accountants have been beavering away for Nadir, preparing a damages case.
Using the claim Vincent Tchenguiz is currently pursuing against the SFO as its model, the Nadir camp was planning to sue the SFO, and therefore the Government, for millions as soon as Asil was found innocent.
....


Others are saying that he was no longer flavour of the month in the Occupied Areas.

Others are saying the young Mrs Nadir was getting very bored in the Open Prison of "tncrtnc"/Turkey.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby supporttheunderdog » Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:16 am

a certain Mr Tatar (mentioned above) has claimed Nadir is innocent and it was advisers who did the naughty stuff - now who was treasurer to Polly Peck at the time of the dodgy money moves?
User avatar
supporttheunderdog
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8397
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: limassol

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby barouti » Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:57 pm

bill cobbett wrote: Jees, wasn't expecting a verdict for months. Shame it didn't drag on and perhaps discussion could have turned to the role of the GB Government of the time in this affair.


Your majesty's government supported the invasion, ethnic-cleansing and division of the island and still does!


To quote this carpetbagger: "[In 1974] Britain and Greece declined and Turkey, after consultation with Britain, went in there and intervened."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17560821

Not a big secret, is it, but sometbing you can readily deny thanks to the Greek Cypriot fifth columnists in this forum. But it doest matter anyway because the facts are there that the the UK supported the invasion and continues to support :

"The Former British Foreign Minister Jack Straw has said that that the Republic of Cyprus should not represent the natural reserves off the island’s coast"
http://www.defencegreece.com/index.php/ ... -argument/

"IT IS time for the UK government to “consider the formal partition of Cyprus” if the current round of UN-backed reunification talks fail, former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw wrote in The Times yesterday."
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/cyprus/uk-ur ... n/20101109

There aren't only fifth columnists in Cyprus but it seems also a majority of Cypriots in the UK who prefer to say nothing when crap like this is splattered by the Brits :evil:

So Nadir confirmed what we all know anyway, that the UK was well aware and even encouraged the Turco invasion 1974.

And what does Mr Limey have to say about this"

"I saw a site elsewhere which suggested the British did not support the invasion but wanted to send ships to intervene in the area and stop it, but they in turn were stopped by the Americans..."
posting.php?mode=quote&f=8&p=726843

Mr Limey, are you going to recant and admit UK collusion with the Turks in 1974 or are you going to continue to argue with your head in the sand that the Brits had nothing to do with 1974...!!!??? :|
User avatar
barouti
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 2:28 pm

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby Me Ed » Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:17 pm

This thread is about Asil Nadir and not about the Greeks and the deluded wannabes giving Turkey an excuse to invade on a plate.
User avatar
Me Ed
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:24 pm
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby supporttheunderdog » Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:18 am

barouti wrote:
bill cobbett wrote: Jees, wasn't expecting a verdict for months. Shame it didn't drag on and perhaps discussion could have turned to the role of the GB Government of the time in this affair.


Your majesty's government supported the invasion, ethnic-cleansing and division of the island and still does!


To quote this carpetbagger: "[In 1974] Britain and Greece declined and Turkey, after consultation with Britain, went in there and intervened."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17560821

Not a big secret, is it, but sometbing you can readily deny thanks to the Greek Cypriot fifth columnists in this forum. But it doest matter anyway because the facts are there that the the UK supported the invasion and continues to support :

"The Former British Foreign Minister Jack Straw has said that that the Republic of Cyprus should not represent the natural reserves off the island’s coast"
http://www.defencegreece.com/index.php/ ... -argument/

"IT IS time for the UK government to “consider the formal partition of Cyprus” if the current round of UN-backed reunification talks fail, former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw wrote in The Times yesterday."
http://www.cyprus-mail.com/cyprus/uk-ur ... n/20101109

There aren't only fifth columnists in Cyprus but it seems also a majority of Cypriots in the UK who prefer to say nothing when crap like this is splattered by the Brits :evil:

So Nadir confirmed what we all know anyway, that the UK was well aware and even encouraged the Turco invasion 1974.

And what does Mr Limey have to say about this"

"I saw a site elsewhere which suggested the British did not support the invasion but wanted to send ships to intervene in the area and stop it, but they in turn were stopped by the Americans..."
posting.php?mode=quote&f=8&p=726843

Mr Limey, are you going to recant and admit UK collusion with the Turks in 1974 or are you going to continue to argue with your head in the sand that the Brits had nothing to do with 1974...!!!??? :|

No I am not going to recant - so F*ck off. Asil Nardir is a crook with no status as a spokesperson for the UK and I would not trust anything he says to try to get himself off the hook.
User avatar
supporttheunderdog
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8397
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:03 pm
Location: limassol

Re: Asil Nadir found guilty.

Postby Me Ed » Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:04 am

Looks like the campaign to change the name of occupied Cyprus in the articles about Asil Nadir in various UK newspapers has rattled the Turkish ambassador's cage:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/04/cyprus-problem-not-invasion?newsfeed=true

:D
User avatar
Me Ed
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:24 pm
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests