Well the Turkish Cypriots voted for the Annan Plan which was to unite Cyprus.
Wrong. The TCs voted for Annan
partition plan which was to legalize the division on the island.
Therefore the question is indeed: Do Turkish Cypriots want a united Cyprus and they voted the Annan plan simply because Turkey didn't allow unity as an alternative, or partition is what the majority of TCs want, and this is why they liked the Annan partition plan?
The current leadership of the GC's prefers partition to BBF, IMO.
The current leadership has no problem with a form of BBF that would respect the human and democratic rights of everybody. What we have a problem with is not BBF, but the violation of our human and democratic rights that comes from the proposed "BBC" (Bi-zonal Bi-communal Confederation).
I will tell you a BBF that would be fine:
The north state has a size of no more than 18%. If all TCs choose to live in that state (since they are the ones who insist on this form of separation) then even if
ALL GCs return to their homes and even if more GCs become residents of the northern state, the TCs will remain the big majority there.
Then the country as a whole functions as a true federation (other examples of Federations are USA, Russia) made by two states.
So what we have is
Bizonal (just 2 zones, not more)
Bicommual (each community is the controlling majority in each state)
Federation (it functions on the same principles as other Federations)
No problem. So don't tell me that we don't accept BBF because we don't accept
your version of BBF that is actually a "BBC" and its full with human rights violations!
I repeat: what we do not accept is our human and democratic rights violations. BBF is possible to happen with no (or very very small amount) such violations, and this is the kind of BBF we accept.
If you expect from us to accept the violations of our human and democratic rights then no, we will not.