boulio wrote:Does anyone know what the population of the area in question would satisfy concerning return of properties(ie refugees)this would also satisfy a large junk of judgments in the ehrc concering properieties against turkey
40.000
boulio wrote:Does anyone know what the population of the area in question would satisfy concerning return of properties(ie refugees)this would also satisfy a large junk of judgments in the ehrc concering properieties against turkey
boulio wrote:cant they just ecxept the offer that is endorsed by the un and eu and all side get what they want is it so f*cking difficult.it will provide a dynamic for a settlement unless no one wants one.
humanist wrote:Any joint venture in relation to Maras it should be under the conditions we put forward and we put forward a great plan a couple of years ago. That's a city they should not have and any compromise needs to come from them. Of course they have more to gain through Reunification than what we do.
Viewpoint wrote:boulio wrote:cant they just ecxept the offer that is endorsed by the un and eu and all side get what they want is it so f*cking difficult.it will provide a dynamic for a settlement unless no one wants one.
Finally you have worked it out neither side really wants a solution.
Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:boulio wrote:cant they just ecxept the offer that is endorsed by the un and eu and all side get what they want is it so f*cking difficult.it will provide a dynamic for a settlement unless no one wants one.
Finally you have worked it out neither side really wants a solution.
this is a twisted half truth VP, one side doesn't really want a solution and it is the side which does not adhere to the 'resolutions' endorsed by the UN and the EU. That is the Turkish side.
Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:boulio wrote:cant they just ecxept the offer that is endorsed by the un and eu and all side get what they want is it so f*cking difficult.it will provide a dynamic for a settlement unless no one wants one.
Finally you have worked it out neither side really wants a solution.
this is a twisted half truth VP, one side doesn't really want a solution and it is the side which does not adhere to the 'resolutions' endorsed by the UN and the EU. That is the Turkish side.
Thats where you are wrong the UN resolutions will not solve the dispute all the world knows full well that its was the GCs who rejected the UN plan and the TCs accepted it, so you people are viewed as the side not wanting a solution.
Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Maximus wrote:Viewpoint wrote:boulio wrote:cant they just ecxept the offer that is endorsed by the un and eu and all side get what they want is it so f*cking difficult.it will provide a dynamic for a settlement unless no one wants one.
Finally you have worked it out neither side really wants a solution.
this is a twisted half truth VP, one side doesn't really want a solution and it is the side which does not adhere to the 'resolutions' endorsed by the UN and the EU. That is the Turkish side.
Thats where you are wrong the UN resolutions will not solve the dispute all the world knows full well that its was the GCs who rejected the UN plan and the TCs accepted it, so you people are viewed as the side not wanting a solution.
are you referring to the annan plan? Your seriously lost VP
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests