Bananiot wrote:Here, a biologist tells us that teaching evolution is tantamount to indoctrination. What's the difference Bill?
All three of us are scientists koumbare, sciences based on evidence from such things as repeatable experiments and observations and building on these through logical reasoning on the results to reach some conclusions, so that we might get a
better description of the world around us. A
better description cos Science, unlike doctrine, is and always will be a work in progress and there will always be refinements to theories to get better descriptions...
If we follow this then scientific method can't therefore be a doctrine cos science is inherently open to change with the results of new experiments and observations, with old theories thrown out and new theories which offer better descriptions than current ones adopted, so it really is a nonsense to claim it as a doctrine.
Scientific theories change, doctrines don't.