Cyprus-Forum.com

[CBBB]

Just watched all of it and have no sympathy for the Carpetbuggerers!!!!

How can they go to the ECHR and if they get a ruling in their favour expect an unrecognised regime to take any notice of it, especially as the ECHR has already ruled in a number of cases that most of the land the properties is built on belongs to GCs?

Having seen the pathetic appearance of Lord McBlackstuff in this comedy, I am very glad that I have taken out Cypriot nationality and no longer have to say that I am British!

No tears shed here!!!!

[humanist]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

[Jerry]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

I believe they are taking Turkey to the ECHR because they know the "trnc" is not recognised. According to the ECHR Turkey is the controlling power with regard to GC claims so the IPC was recognised as a channel for claiming compensation. It will be interesting to see if the carpetbagger claims are looked upon in the same way or if they are considered to be an internal matter in which case they will not be allowed.

It will be a serious blow if the European Court of Human Rights declares that the "trnc" is an illegal entity and that the carpetbaggers have no right to acquire Greek Cypriot property.

Let's hope that their application to the ECHR is an own goal.

[bill cobbett]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

I believe they are taking Turkey to the ECHR because they know the "trnc" is not recognised. According to the ECHR Turkey is the controlling power with regard to GC claims so the IPC was recognised as a channel for claiming compensation. It will be interesting to see if the carpetbagger claims are looked upon in the same way or if they are considered to be an internal matter in which case they will not be allowed.

It will be a serious blow if the European Court of Human Rights declares that the "trnc" is an illegal entity and that the carpetbaggers have no right to acquire Greek Cypriot property.

Let's hope that their application to the ECHR is an own goal.

Jerry file, be very sceptical, failing the production of a case number be very sceptical indeed as to whether any alleged application has actually been made to the ECHR by any of the CarpetSquatters.

If indeed an application has been made, any such application, as with the dozens and dozens of other cases that we're all familiar with, would have to show at the outset that the "effective local remedy" has been exhausted and as with the other cases over the years, the effective local remedy will most likely be deemed to be an action before the Courts of the Republic against Turkey as the Occupying Power.

... now can anyone imagine any of the CarpetScum sticking their filthy heads above the Turkish Parapet and turning up with their Photoshopped Kochans at the Courts of the Republic and making themselves liable to arrest for contravening the Republic's Criminal Code, for dealing in Stolen Properties...???

[Jerry]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

I believe they are taking Turkey to the ECHR because they know the "trnc" is not recognised. According to the ECHR Turkey is the controlling power with regard to GC claims so the IPC was recognised as a channel for claiming compensation. It will be interesting to see if the carpetbagger claims are looked upon in the same way or if they are considered to be an internal matter in which case they will not be allowed.

It will be a serious blow if the European Court of Human Rights declares that the "trnc" is an illegal entity and that the carpetbaggers have no right to acquire Greek Cypriot property.

Let's hope that their application to the ECHR is an own goal.

Jerry file, be very sceptical, failing the production of a case number be very sceptical indeed as to whether any alleged application has actually been made to the ECHR by any of the CarpetSquatters.

If indeed an application has been made, any such application, as with the dozens and dozens of other cases that we're all familiar with, would have to show at the outset that the "effective local remedy" has been exhausted and as with the other cases over the years, the effective local remedy will most likely be deemed to be an action before the Courts of the Republic against Turkey as the Occupying Power.

... now can anyone imagine any of the CarpetScum sticking their filthy heads above the Turkish Parapet and turning up with their Photoshopped Kochans at the Courts of the Republic and making themselves liable to arrest for contravening the Republic's Criminal Code, for dealing in Stolen Properties...???

Bill, Pauline Read has actually done that. I questioned her on NCFP when she said she had made an application to ECHR and she quite clearly said that the claim would be against Turkey not "trnc"

Hello Pauline

[supporttheunderdog]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

I believe they are taking Turkey to the ECHR because they know the "trnc" is not recognised. According to the ECHR Turkey is the controlling power with regard to GC claims so the IPC was recognised as a channel for claiming compensation. It will be interesting to see if the carpetbagger claims are looked upon in the same way or if they are considered to be an internal matter in which case they will not be allowed.

It will be a serious blow if the European Court of Human Rights declares that the "trnc" is an illegal entity and that the carpetbaggers have no right to acquire Greek Cypriot property.

Let's hope that their application to the ECHR is an own goal.

Jerry file, be very sceptical, failing the production of a case number be very sceptical indeed as to whether any alleged application has actually been made to the ECHR by any of the CarpetSquatters.

If indeed an application has been made, any such application, as with the dozens and dozens of other cases that we're all familiar with, would have to show at the outset that the "effective local remedy" has been exhausted and as with the other cases over the years, the effective local remedy will most likely be deemed to be an action before the Courts of the Republic against Turkey as the Occupying Power.

... now can anyone imagine any of the CarpetScum sticking their filthy heads above the Turkish Parapet and turning up with their Photoshopped Kochans at the Courts of the Republic and making themselves liable to arrest for contravening the Republic's Criminal Code, for dealing in Stolen Properties...???

Bill, Pauline Read has actually done that. I questioned her on NCFP when she said she had made an application to ECHR and she quite clearly said that the claim would be against Turkey not "trnc"

Hello Pauline

if the original owner is traceable, should he be assisted to intervene in any ECHR action and produce the deeds to show he is the lawful owner of the land, and/or for the ROC Government to intervene and comment that transactions involving the Carpet b*ggers are tainted with illegality so the contracts are uneforceable.?

[apc2010]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

I believe they are taking Turkey to the ECHR because they know the "trnc" is not recognised. According to the ECHR Turkey is the controlling power with regard to GC claims so the IPC was recognised as a channel for claiming compensation. It will be interesting to see if the carpetbagger claims are looked upon in the same way or if they are considered to be an internal matter in which case they will not be allowed.

It will be a serious blow if the European Court of Human Rights declares that the "trnc" is an illegal entity and that the carpetbaggers have no right to acquire Greek Cypriot property.

Let's hope that their application to the ECHR is an own goal.

Jerry file, be very sceptical, failing the production of a case number be very sceptical indeed as to whether any alleged application has actually been made to the ECHR by any of the CarpetSquatters.

If indeed an application has been made, any such application, as with the dozens and dozens of other cases that we're all familiar with, would have to show at the outset that the "effective local remedy" has been exhausted and as with the other cases over the years, the effective local remedy will most likely be deemed to be an action before the Courts of the Republic against Turkey as the Occupying Power.

... now can anyone imagine any of the CarpetScum sticking their filthy heads above the Turkish Parapet and turning up with their Photoshopped Kochans at the Courts of the Republic and making themselves liable to arrest for contravening the Republic's Criminal Code, for dealing in Stolen Properties...???

Bill, Pauline Read has actually done that. I questioned her on NCFP when she said she had made an application to ECHR and she quite clearly said that the claim would be against Turkey not "trnc"

Hello Pauline

if the original owner is traceable, should he be assisted to intervene in any ECHR action and produce the deeds to show he is the lawful owner of the land, and/or for the ROC Government to intervene and comment that transactions involving the Carpet b*ggers are tainted with illegality so the contracts are uneforceable.?

Could not agree more............

[bill cobbett]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

I believe they are taking Turkey to the ECHR because they know the "trnc" is not recognised. According to the ECHR Turkey is the controlling power with regard to GC claims so the IPC was recognised as a channel for claiming compensation. It will be interesting to see if the carpetbagger claims are looked upon in the same way or if they are considered to be an internal matter in which case they will not be allowed.

It will be a serious blow if the European Court of Human Rights declares that the "trnc" is an illegal entity and that the carpetbaggers have no right to acquire Greek Cypriot property.

Let's hope that their application to the ECHR is an own goal.

Jerry file, be very sceptical, failing the production of a case number be very sceptical indeed as to whether any alleged application has actually been made to the ECHR by any of the CarpetSquatters.

If indeed an application has been made, any such application, as with the dozens and dozens of other cases that we're all familiar with, would have to show at the outset that the "effective local remedy" has been exhausted and as with the other cases over the years, the effective local remedy will most likely be deemed to be an action before the Courts of the Republic against Turkey as the Occupying Power.

... now can anyone imagine any of the CarpetScum sticking their filthy heads above the Turkish Parapet and turning up with their Photoshopped Kochans at the Courts of the Republic and making themselves liable to arrest for contravening the Republic's Criminal Code, for dealing in Stolen Properties...???

Bill, Pauline Read has actually done that. I questioned her on NCFP when she said she had made an application to ECHR and she quite clearly said that the claim would be against Turkey not "trnc"

Hello Pauline

Jerry koumbare, without a case number for verification, the claim of a claim remains... a claim.

[apc2010]

http://northcyprusfreepress.com/2012/05 ... tims-cash/

[Jerry]

I don't think the ECHR is going to empathise with them. They have bought stolen lad lol .... if the Court finds in their favour then they will have to acknowledge the buying stolen goods os okay.

I believe they are taking Turkey to the ECHR because they know the "trnc" is not recognised. According to the ECHR Turkey is the controlling power with regard to GC claims so the IPC was recognised as a channel for claiming compensation. It will be interesting to see if the carpetbagger claims are looked upon in the same way or if they are considered to be an internal matter in which case they will not be allowed.

It will be a serious blow if the European Court of Human Rights declares that the "trnc" is an illegal entity and that the carpetbaggers have no right to acquire Greek Cypriot property.

Let's hope that their application to the ECHR is an own goal.

Jerry file, be very sceptical, failing the production of a case number be very sceptical indeed as to whether any alleged application has actually been made to the ECHR by any of the CarpetSquatters.

If indeed an application has been made, any such application, as with the dozens and dozens of other cases that we're all familiar with, would have to show at the outset that the "effective local remedy" has been exhausted and as with the other cases over the years, the effective local remedy will most likely be deemed to be an action before the Courts of the Republic against Turkey as the Occupying Power.

... now can anyone imagine any of the CarpetScum sticking their filthy heads above the Turkish Parapet and turning up with their Photoshopped Kochans at the Courts of the Republic and making themselves liable to arrest for contravening the Republic's Criminal Code, for dealing in Stolen Properties...???

A bit more here Bill, ( last posts) in case you missed it, from the horses mouth.

http://northcyprusfreepress.com/2012/05 ... geting-me/