Cyprus-Forum.com

[kurupetos]

Flipping heck you people are dumb and getting dumber by each post, who does sovereignty belong to? if its a nation then we are part of that nation so we to have just as much right to the sovereignty of this island as you do. Thats why we have a right share if not in unity in division, seeing we are unable share together as one we have to separately, you cannot force us or just we have no rights.

You do not have the right of self-determination, i.e., partition. Your rights are defined by the 1959/1960 Treaty of Guarantee/Constitution.

The 2004 AP was only a solution proposal and we had every right to reject it.

[Viewpoint]

Flipping heck you people are dumb and getting dumber by each post, who does sovereignty belong to? if its a nation then we are part of that nation so we to have just as much right to the sovereignty of this island as you do. Thats why we have a right share if not in unity in division, seeing we are unable share together as one we have to separately, you cannot force us or just we have no rights.

You do not have the right of self-determination, i.e., partition. Your rights are defined by the 1959/1960 Treaty of Guarantee/Constitution.

The 2004 AP was only a solution proposal and we had every right to reject it.

But you reject every deal put before because you have what you want your own country without TCs the only think you have to do is make you want a solution to keep the refugees quite and enjoy all the benefits of recognition. Why should you want a solution?

[kurupetos]

Flipping heck you people are dumb and getting dumber by each post, who does sovereignty belong to? if its a nation then we are part of that nation so we to have just as much right to the sovereignty of this island as you do. Thats why we have a right share if not in unity in division, seeing we are unable share together as one we have to separately, you cannot force us or just we have no rights.

You do not have the right of self-determination, i.e., partition. Your rights are defined by the 1959/1960 Treaty of Guarantee/Constitution.

The 2004 AP was only a solution proposal and we had every right to reject it.

But you reject every deal put before because you have what ...

We have the right to do so.

[Viewpoint]

Well done, thanks for the TRNC.

[kurupetos]

Well done, thanks for the TRNC.

If you were so happy with your iniquitous regime, you wouldn't be in the negotiating table.

[Viewpoint]

Well done, thanks for the TRNC.

If you were so happy with your iniquitous regime, you wouldn't be in the negotiating table.

We would be stupid not to investigate any offer that might place us in a stronger position than we are today, but what you offer dont cut it.

[wyoming cowboy]

It seems to me the Varoshites voted no to the return of Varosha in 2004. And so did the Omorfites. They got what they wanted. What on earth is the big fuss all about.

We will never accept partition. Get over it.

Hello physical partition has happened get over it cause you cant do anything to take what we have.

And you can never own what you've stolen

You cannot steal whats already yours.

The Tc cannot claim sovereignty through the pseudo state artificially created on stolen lands. Any acts or actions taken up by the pseudo state are nullified under international law. The only way for the Tc to claim any sort of rights on Cyprus is the 30 percent minority status they signed up for through The Republic of Cyprus. The illegality and illegitimacy of the pseudo state has been emphasized many times through UN resolutions and the European Courts of Human Rights. So your claim of sovereignty of Cyprus through an illegal entity is stupid.

[Viewpoint]

And what does that change exactly? The TRNC is here to stay.

[bill cobbett]

And what does that change exactly? The TRNC is here to stay.

Thought "crnt" was gonna have another re-naming soon.

[wyoming cowboy]

And what does that change exactly? The TRNC is here to stay.

The pseudo state is nothing more then an air bubble floating in the air with a short lifespan