This year they have a new recruit.
As to Turkey being scared, of what exactly?
Who wishes to join a bankrupt organization in recession. Grow up.
MR-from-NG wrote:Cap wrote:Sad thing about these imposters, they ORIGINATE from Cyprus.
They're legitimate citizens according to the RoC.
How right you are Cap. If only we were treated as such we may have had the same enthusiasm as you with regards to RoC's EU presidency. If you stooped calling us Ottoman remnants and if you treated us as equals we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
supporttheunderdog wrote:a balanced comment Kimon: I have a feeling that if anything the christian element could be latins who enjoyed power and prestige under the Lusignans amd Venetians. but who lost privilge under the Ottomans when the Orthodox church began to assume preeminance, and who adopted the Moslem faith and Turkish language to maintain an element of prestige and the benefits not enoyed by the Christian population ie lower taxes, exemption from military service, etc.
kimon07 wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:a balanced comment Kimon: I have a feeling that if anything the christian element could be latins who enjoyed power and prestige under the Lusignans amd Venetians. but who lost privilge under the Ottomans when the Orthodox church began to assume preeminance, and who adopted the Moslem faith and Turkish language to maintain an element of prestige and the benefits not enoyed by the Christian population ie lower taxes, exemption from military service, etc.
Can not comment anything in regard to the Latin element but on the other hand, there are many records and reports about the "Linopambakoi" i.e., the Greek Cypriots who converted to Islam. For instance, in the registries of many "enories" (church districts) all over the island, in which the Christian families were being recorded (as even today) you will find entries or rather "write offs" of whole families with the note: "Eturkepsan" meaning they turned Turkish. Most of them tried to convert back to Christianity when the British took over but the Church would not accept them back lest they would "contaminate" the Christian community.
bill cobbett wrote:kimon07 wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:a balanced comment Kimon: I have a feeling that if anything the christian element could be latins who enjoyed power and prestige under the Lusignans amd Venetians. but who lost privilge under the Ottomans when the Orthodox church began to assume preeminance, and who adopted the Moslem faith and Turkish language to maintain an element of prestige and the benefits not enoyed by the Christian population ie lower taxes, exemption from military service, etc.
Can not comment anything in regard to the Latin element but on the other hand, there are many records and reports about the "Linopambakoi" i.e., the Greek Cypriots who converted to Islam. For instance, in the registries of many "enories" (church districts) all over the island, in which the Christian families were being recorded (as even today) you will find entries or rather "write offs" of whole families with the note: "Eturkepsan" meaning they turned Turkish. Most of them tried to convert back to Christianity when the British took over but the Church would not accept them back lest they would "contaminate" the Christian community.
Very interesting Kimon. Naturally am familiar with the word "enories" but didn't know it relates to church districts and so equates to the English word "parish".
supporttheunderdog wrote:a balanced comment Kimon: I have a feeling that if anything the christian element could be latins who enjoyed power and prestige under the Lusignans amd Venetians. but who lost privilge under the Ottomans when the Orthodox church began to assume preeminance, and who adopted the Moslem faith and Turkish language to maintain an element of prestige and the benefits not enoyed by the Christian population ie lower taxes, exemption from military service, etc.
bill cobbett wrote:Very interesting Kimon. Naturally am familiar with the word "enories" but didn't know it relates to church districts and so equates to the English word "parish".
Although their homeland had been dominated by foreigners for many centuries, it was only after the imposition of Ottoman rule that Orthodox Christians began to develop a really strong sense of cohesiveness. This change was prompted by the Ottoman practice of ruling the empire through millets, or religious communities.
Rather than suppressing the empire's many religious communities, the Turks allowed them a degree of automony as long as they complied with the demands of the sultan. The vast size and the ethnic variety of the empire made such a policy imperative. The system of governing through millets reestablished the authority of the Church of Cyprus and made its head the Greek Cypriot leader, or ethnarch. It became the responsibility of the ethnarch to administer the territories where his flock lived and to collect taxes. The religious convictions and functions of the ethnarch were of no concern to the empire as long as its needs were met.In 1575 the Turks granted permission for the return of the archbishop and the three bishops of the Church of Cyprus to their respective sees. They also abolished the feudal system for they saw it as an extraneous power structure, unnecessary and dangerous. The autocephalous Church of Cyprus could function in its place for the political and fiscal administration of the island's Christian inhabitants. Its structured hierarchy put even remote villages within easy reach of the central authority. Both parties benefited. Greek Cypriots gained a measure of autonomy, and the empire received revenues without the bother of administration.
The Ottoman conquest of Cyprus in 1571 delivered the Greek population from serfdom and servitude to the Latin church. Cypriot Greeks were now able to take control of the land they had been working on for centuries. The local Christians resumed practicing their religion in the only acceptable way they knew. The patriarch serving the Ottoman sultan also acted as ethnarch, or leader of the Greek nation, thus enabling the local Orthodox representative to practice decidedly secular powers, for instance in adjudicating justice and in the collection of taxes.
Despite the inherent oppression of foreign subjugation, the period of Ottoman rule (1570-1878) had a limited impact on Greek Cypriot culture. The Ottomans tended to administer their multicultural empire with the help of their subject millets, or religious communities. The tolerance of the millet system permitted the Greek Cypriot community to survive, administered on behalf of Constantinople by the Archbishop of the Church of Cyprus, who became the community's head, or ethnarch. Although religiously tolerant, Ottoman rule was generally harsh and inefficient. Turkish settlers suffered alongside their Greek Cypriot neighbors, and the two groups together endured centuries of oppressive governance from Constantinople. A minority of Greek Cypriots converted to Islam during this period, and are sometimes referred to as "neo-Muslims" by historians.[9][10]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests