kimon07 wrote:But, which are the reasons due to which the 40.000 elite, battle hardened, well trained, very much disciplined and very well equipped British Troops failed to subdue the 250 EOKA fighters?
Many explanations and reasons have been given already by historians. I challenge and invite the forum members to either dispute the British defeat or to express their opinion for it. From my part, I quote below what Great George Grivas himself said about this issue in his memoirs:
“I doubt whether there was a single boy above the age of twelve who did not take part in some mission during the Cyprus campaign. I know no other example in history where the whole of a country's youth, boys and girls, has taken so active and effective a part in the struggle for their country's freedom. Even the little boys of the primary schools played their part. Apart from the demonstrations in which they were at the side of their seniors, they carried on a peculiar struggle of their own, the 'Battle of the Flags', as they called it.
Bananiot wrote:I think the most important contribution of Don here is what he said about a conscript army standing no chance at all in front of a well trained and armed professional army. Of course we stand to be accused of derailing the subject which is one of a bunch of villagers, some of the brave type some of the murderous type, led by a simpleton army spare over and a "clever" clergy man, who defeated the British Empire in 1955-1959. Now, the people who believe these fairy tales are the most patriotic forumers, who claim that they have the magic potion to free Cyprus. This type of stupid mentality has brought Cyprus to its knees, but these people never learn, until we lose the whole of the island.
boulio wrote:the income that is gained by the sba is futile in comparison to the income that would be gained if the areas of the sba would be given back to the ROC, WE are talking about roughly 3% of the land area of cyprus with beach front property.
Don Kelley wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:kimon07 wrote: ... WHY WAS the mighty British Empire DEFEATED BY GRIVAS (the GREEK Cypriot hero) and EOKA.
Because they listened to Sir Winston Churchill.
"It is only natural that the Cypriot peoble who are of Greek descent, should regard their incorporation into their mother country as an ideal to be earnestly, devoutedly and fervently cherished."
They aren't Greek descent they are Arabs who were owned by the Egyptians.
Now how bad can that be to be owned by the Egyptians?
Bananiot wrote:I think the most important contribution of Don here is what he said about a conscript army standing no chance at all in front of a well trained and armed professional army. Of course we stand to be accused of derailing the subject which is one of a bunch of villagers, some of the brave type some of the murderous type, led by a simpleton army spare over and a "clever" clergy man, who defeated the British Empire in 1955-1959. Now, the people who believe these fairy tales are the most patriotic forumers, who claim that they have the magic potion to free Cyprus. This type of stupid mentality has brought Cyprus to its knees, but these people never learn, until we lose the whole of the island.
Massive gathering that took place in Limassol, then Nicosia Commercial Club. The people marched to Government House to demonstrate their unwavering resolve for union of Cyprus with Greece. Stoning of Government House and the torching of four cars of the occupation forces, as well as of the wooden structure of Government House. The intervention of the police to disperse the crowd resulted in a death and wounding of demonstrators. Similar protests took place in other towns and many Cypriot villages. The English eventually managed to impose order with the help of the army, having left dead and many injured people behind.Bananiot wrote:Poor arguments cowboy, extremely poor. Just to suggest that the Brits would send settlers to Cyprus shows how much you understand these matters. Britain has been a democracy for tens of centuries and its people cannot be ordered around by any government. Really cowboy! You basically understood nothing of what I wrote and conveniently did not see that the great ethnarch, Papadopoulos himself, also admitted to the same exactly things as Lanitis and Klerides. The part about prophets after Christ is more than stupid as these and many other people warned of the consequences of the armed struggle before and immediately after it started.
Kimon keeps mumbling about EOKA defeating Britain militarily. By 1959 EOKA was as good as dead. In fact, one of the issues that the Brits used to squeeze the arm of Makarios into eventually accepting the proposed deal, was that they knew exactly where Grivas was hiding and had Makarios not signed, they would pick him up the next day. Even Constantine Karamanlis used the same argument to convince Makarios to sign. Otherwise, there would be no point in Makarios agreeing to an end of the armed struggle when the objectives of the struggle were not met and on top the TC's were made equal partners in an independent country with veto rights. Think hard Kimon, why did he call it a day in 1959 and not thrown the proposals into the dustbin in Lancaster House, if EOKA was not defeated and could still bring about enosis through the armed struggle?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests