The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby Don Kelley » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:13 pm

Bananiot wrote:Our newly discoverd friends will do this for us, while we watch soap operas on tv or wage war through Internet. We used to call them the "Jewish State" and now, miraculously, they became Israel. Even arch Palestinian supporter and President to be Mrs Theocharous, has conveniently forgotten the plight of the Palestinians and started learning Jewish!

The palestinians learnt a lot from EOKA, like hiding behind women.
Don Kelley
Member
Member
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:36 pm

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby Don Kelley » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:17 pm

KIMONO 7

Why did you let the Turks walk all over you in 74? Here's a clue c*w**ds. I mean where were all the grown up children of the EOKA days?
Don Kelley
Member
Member
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:36 pm

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby Don Kelley » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:26 pm

[quote=Don Kelley]“Hold on a minute 250 GCs? didn't someone else say all the young GC boys were in the EOKA? It looks like you've inherited the GC habit of being economical with the truth.
50 million Brits my arse, more like young conscripts between the age of 18-21.”?[/quote]

So the GCs copied Hitler when he formed the Hitler Youth by forming 'The EOKA YOUTH' to do their dirty work, nothing changes does it.
"You face them boys whilst we shoot them in the back"
Don Kelley
Member
Member
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:36 pm

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby tsukoui » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:28 pm

Let's be clear it was not British soldiers that caused the problems of '74 it was so called British Intelligence... the coomunist kids of the EOKA days who risked there lives resisting the British were all in the UK...
tsukoui
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:10 pm

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby Don Kelley » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:28 pm

kimon07 wrote:Why did the Turkish invasion succeed?
Could it be that the GCs ran. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Don Kelley
Member
Member
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:36 pm

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby Don Kelley » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:31 pm

The Greek Cypriots have just confirmed a new national anthem, its the old 'Spencer Davis' hit hit song 'Keep on Runnin' :lol: :lol: :lol: Sponsored by Reebok
Don Kelley
Member
Member
 
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 6:36 pm

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby Jerry » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:13 pm

GreekIslandGirl wrote:
The document I refer to follows on from yours.

"... the British Government's role is indisputable. In a letter of 11th March 1971 from Seconde (Southern European Department, FCO), to Ramsbotham (High Commissioner in Cyprus), the former writes:
"We have been through the 1963 papers, which tend to confirm that the Thirteen Points were indeed framed with British help and encouragement; that the then High Commissioner [Clark] considered them to be reasonable prospects; and that our intention was to promote their acceptance by the Turks"
Ramsbotham (HC, Cyprus) wrote later to Seconde:
“Makarios, ever the gentleman, took sole responsibility for the Thirteen Points” PRO FCO 9/1353-WSC 1/1"

ibid


Well we have conflicting reports then. It looks like Britain may have “framed and encouraged” but then probably “decided not to back”

“The full story remains obscure”


On 30 November 1963, President Makarios wrote to Vice- President Küçük proposing thirteen amendments to the constitution which, he said, would 'remove obstacles to the smooth functioning and development of the state'. He did so apparently with the knowledge and encouragement of the British High Commissioner, Sir Arthur Clarke, whether personally or officially is not clear: the full story of this remains obscure. The approach certainly had the qualities of comprehensiveness and candour
http://web.archive.org/web/200609051344 ... n-%203.htm
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby CBBB » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:20 pm

Don Kelley wrote:The Greek Cypriots have just confirmed a new national anthem, its the old 'Spencer Davis' hit hit song 'Keep on Runnin' :lol: :lol: :lol: Sponsored by Reebok


Amazing, some bog Irish twat thinks he knows something about Cyprus.
User avatar
CBBB
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11521
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 1:15 pm
Location: Centre of the Universe

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby GreekIslandGirl » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:39 pm

Jerry wrote:
GreekIslandGirl wrote:
The document I refer to follows on from yours.

"... the British Government's role is indisputable. In a letter of 11th March 1971 from Seconde (Southern European Department, FCO), to Ramsbotham (High Commissioner in Cyprus), the former writes:
"We have been through the 1963 papers, which tend to confirm that the Thirteen Points were indeed framed with British help and encouragement; that the then High Commissioner [Clark] considered them to be reasonable prospects; and that our intention was to promote their acceptance by the Turks"
Ramsbotham (HC, Cyprus) wrote later to Seconde:
“Makarios, ever the gentleman, took sole responsibility for the Thirteen Points” PRO FCO 9/1353-WSC 1/1"

ibid


Well we have conflicting reports then. It looks like Britain may have “framed and encouraged” but then probably “decided not to back”

“The full story remains obscure”


On 30 November 1963, President Makarios wrote to Vice- President Küçük proposing thirteen amendments to the constitution which, he said, would 'remove obstacles to the smooth functioning and development of the state'. He did so apparently with the knowledge and encouragement of the British High Commissioner, Sir Arthur Clarke, whether personally or officially is not clear: the full story of this remains obscure. The approach certainly had the qualities of comprehensiveness and candour
http://web.archive.org/web/200609051344 ... n-%203.htm


No, Jerry, we don't have 'conflicting' reports. The much later document I referred you to reveals what was going on that we were not privy to previously. We do not have the full story for sure - but if new documents shed more light we should be prepared to re-evaluate our history and not be dogmatic about the half-truths fed to us.
User avatar
GreekIslandGirl
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9083
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:03 am

Re: Why was Britain defeated by EOKA?

Postby kimon07 » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:57 pm

Don Kelley wrote:KIMONO 7

Why did you let the Turks walk all over you in 74? Here's a clue c*w**ds.......


Aren't you ashamed for having been so disgracefully defeated by 250 cowards? All 40.000 of you dear-poor conscript darlings?
kimon07
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:22 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest