“The following is a dispassionate, well-informed, and somewhat prescient analysis of the Cyprus agreements forged in Zurich and London in 1959. Written by analysts, no doubt with constitutional law scholars among them, at the U.S. State Department, it provides excellent summary and insights into many aspects of the constitutional structure, including the inherent problems in the founding principles of the new republic.
The new constitution of Cyprus will be one of the very few constitutions now in existence which stipulates a dual chief executive. Article I of the Basic Structure provides for a Greek President to be elected by the Greek community and a Turkish Vice President to be elected by the Turkish community. Both officials serve for five years. In spite of the terminology, the President and the Vice President are actually joint chief executives of Cyprus
The series of interlocking documents which constitute the Cyprus settlement establishes a very intricate basis for the new Republic of Cyprus. In a number of respects the solution agreed upon sets up new and largely untried procedures. It attempts to combine some features of a condominium by the three powers with full self-government and independence for the island. It also endeavors to codify in detail the position and rights of the two communities instead of relying on constitutional custom as other countries have done in similar situations. There are dangers inherent not only in the comparative rigidity of the structure of the new state but also in the detailed codification of community rights which will tend to perpetuate rather than eliminate the communal cleavages. However, it is doubtful that the bitterness created by communal strife in Cyprus would have made a more generalized solution acceptable. In the last analysis the success or failure of the Cypriot experiment will depend not only on the ability of the two communities in the island to cooperate, but even more so upon continued collaboration of Greece and Turkey. This collaboration may well become the crucial factor in the future of Cyprus.”http://web.archive.org/web/20060810041339/http://cyprus-conflict.net/analysis_of_treaties.htm
Well we know how sincere Turkey was regarding collaboration, importing arms to the island before the ink was dry on the agreement. VP's response, "you signed it" crap does not wash. If it is still valid why is Turkey still occupying and re-population the island in contravention of the agreement. You can't pick and choose which bits you want to ignore and which bits to keep. Besides, because of the lack of goodwill and the poison of the preceding decade both sides viewed the Zurich agreement as an interim measure. The agreement was a poisoned chalice left behind by the semi-departing colonial power, even the US State Department could see that in 1960.