Paphitis wrote:I think Obama achieved his objectives without war.
Yes, what has been going on in Syria for two years due to Obama and his Al Qaeda friends is not war. It's just a school game.
At the end of the day, Assads chemical weapons are history thanks to a Russia inspired agreement.
Is Obama Russian?
If Obama did not threaten military action then this victory would not have been achieved.
You mean his defeat, which is a victory of the rest of us.
In the end, the world is just a little safer.
Thanks to (a) the Brits (b) Putin and (c) the Sec. Gen. of the UN.
From Assads end, this agreement was also a stroke of genius.
You mean Assad thought of it?
If the rebels have chemical weapons, they will not be able to use them. If they do, then the spotlight will be on them.
They will not use them because the spot light will be on them? The jihadists? The "spot light" will scare them off eh?
Sounds like a good result all round!
You bet. This was/is the first time that the US realised that there are limitations to their arbitrary-unilateral decisions-actions. And to their power. And that the rest of the world seems to be determined now, not to let them drug us to adventures which can lead to a global disaster. And this, indeed, DOES make the world not just a bit but much, much safer.