Robin Hood wrote:Thank you for your ill-informed opinion but it is all true and verified by official information, he merely passes it on in his article.
Before throwing mud at well regarded journalist's who don't support your propaganda ........ check out:
You're welcome. Although, it isn't of course my opinion I'm merely "passing it on in my article".
I invite people to actually read your link - as I doubt many (if any) have. It's a frothing at the mouth, paranoid, anti-US rant. I can see why you like it.
He also writes for Sputnik and RT. Well, there's a surprise! A paragon of objectivity then, just like your good self and the sites you regularly peddle, all of which are filled with people who write end-of-the-world anti-west stuff. Ne'er in them will you ever find even a hint of anything remotely critical of your favoured band of despots and tyrants. At least the man gets paid for his output though and isn't one of the useful idiot brigade.
I used to look into the authors of this sort of stuff as a matter of course but got bored with it. My favourite was the "Respected academic" that underpinned an article on Fallujah. Perhaps you will remember how you used it to support your "The US 'secretly' nuked Fallujah" post
. When I dug a bit it turned out he'd actually been expelled by his own professional body for being a nutter. He was a rabid conspiracy-theorist who's favourite was hawking the idea the Japanese government were involved in a vast plot to secretly plant nuclear material around the country, in order to contaminate the population. Absolutely classic.
Propaganda?? Nahh. Now you've hurt my feelings.
I just wanted to highlight the hypocrisy in your criticising Paphitis's introduction of Trump - somebody who has nothing at all to do with Syria of course, particularly recently, then going on about Ukraine, an area which is clearly fundamental to the region.
So, return of the Trollski then! Welcome back. But - have you fallen out/been banned already? Surely not? If so, it wouldn't have been your fault of course.
I'm not interested in your BBC article. Although, if they're finally getting their act together after the Internet Research Agency and GRU's activities then good on 'em. It's nothing to do with this thread on Syria though. Just like Trump.