RW
The Reuters report is simple factual and without embellishment. It does not refer to ‘
the Assad regime’ or make any sensational claims. The intent is to impart that factual information so, I see absolutely nothing to criticise or question in that report.
That report now lands on the CNN News Desk and is suitably embellished to fashion a desired impression on the reader, to create a scenario and point the finger of blame! I did a scan first such as many do .... headline, then a quick 10 sec. scan of the rest of the paragraphs ..... and if I had an already clouded impression of events the story is very clear. But the report does not stand up to a more detailed study of the content.
So, in brief, according to CNN; We now have 400,000 civilians that have been brutally besieged by the Assad regime for four years. They should be safe as this is a protected de-escalation zone, but infer that Assad is still bombing and shelling them. Some 400 women and children, that is one in every thousand, are in urgent need of food and medical supplies but heartless Assad is not bothered ..... ‘
call me on Tuesday’!
Hamish de Bretton-Gordon OBE, the source of this additional information, is a chemical weapons expert and chief operating officer of SecureBio Limited. He was formerly a British Army officer for 23 years and commanding officer of the UK's CBRN Regiment and NATO's Rapid Reaction CBRN Battalion. So, of course his report would be completely unbiased or influenced in any way
, even though his main customer would be the UK/EU military (
Members of the US Coalition)......... who else is interested in his ‘
chemical weapons’ expertise?
The 500 people he says he ‘
rescued’ from Aleppo were the families of the anti-Assad terrorists and the ‘
Deal’ was initiated by Assad and Russia and agreed with the US coalition ...... I think that is what these 500 are too!
Look at other sources and in reality .......... Assad has this area in lockdown to prevent arms and ammunition entering the de-escalation zone (
that makes sense): the Syrians and the Russians provide aid to this enclave but what happens to it once it enters, is not known (
so they are not attempting to starve the people): neither Assad or the Russians bomb or shell the area (
it would be pointless) they just wait for the terrorists to surrender or to run out of ammo! They just make sure they have a secure perimeter to prevent ammo/weapon replenishment .... although I believe Trump has maybe put a stop to that? There are sometimes clashes between the SAA and these terrorist groups but as far as I can find out air-strikes are not used.
The genuine rebels have for many months, had the chance to lay down their arms and surrender and, provided they are not wanted men or foreign fighters, they are given their freedom to return home. (
tens of thousands have taken this offer) Assad and Russia learned from their experience in dealing with US Coalition brokered truces in Aleppo ...... they didn’t work because the US every time used the truce to replenish the rebel’s military supplies.
The bulk of the 400,000 are civilians who are kept as hostages by the terrorists. (
as we heard time-and-time again after Aleppo was liberated) The Syrians/Russians have created open corridors for civilians to use to get out but they are often shelled and always covered by snipers.
The bombing and shelling is mainly due to the continuous in-fighting between the numerous terrorist groups, each of whom are trying to carve up and protect ‘their’ territory. They also frequently launch mortar attacks on liberated Damascus from this enclave.
Assad also knows that these so called rebels have access to chemical weapons, including SARIN, as they demonstrated in this region 2013! Although the western press created a different story and accused Assad. That was later debunked by the UN and other experts that eventually got access to all the available information. Thankfully, Obama decided on the advise of his military, that there was no evidence to support an invasion and invoke the destruction of Syria. So he made at least one good decision.
If you read these CNN type stories without questioning them it is very easy to get swept up into a completely false scenario ........ and in this war it has happened many, many times. Not all independent news sources are 100% accurate and some are biased just like the MSM is, but if you have a modicum of common sense and a desire to get closer to the truth sorting out the wheat from the chaff is not too difficult.
Try........ for example:
https://southfront.org/military-situation-in-eastern-ghouta-on-december-4-2017-syria-map-update/