Tim Drayton wrote:Assad is a monster and securing a conviction against him for crimes against humanity and war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court appears to me to be the right way to go. It would be nice to see Blair and Bush convicted, too, for Iraq in 2003.
I agree with you, with one provision ....... IF THERE IS SOME REAL VERIFYABLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPRT THE ACCUSATIONS ?
So far all the accusations seem to collapse when investigated by independent inspection whether the Sarin attack in Ghouta, the UN aid convoy, Caesar and his 20,000 photos or the Assad hanging thousands in a Damascus prison or the latest chemical weapon incident ...... over time, when push comes to shove the claims just fall apart.
One strange thing is that, in spite of all the accusations against Assad when they have a vote by Syrians he still gets re-elected as President. Paphitis used to feed us a daily liturgy of war crimes by Assad and Russia in Aleppo as was reflected in the western media. When it was liberated the truth started coming out, it was almost completely ignored in the Western press, yet, on the independent sites there was interview after interview and videos galore showing a completely different story. Almost everything we read turned out to be propaganda.
So, I am all in favour of war criminals being put on trial ...... but not tried just by accusations by those with a vested interest in making an example of those they opposed but a white wash of their own crimes. I cannot se how they could charge Assad without applying the same to Bush, Blair and many others.