The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The war against Syria

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: The war against Syria

Postby miltiades » Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:33 am

Paphitis wrote:
No comprehensive solution means Coalition Wins, Kurds win, and regime stuck chasing its tail for decades.




Russia has had zero success so far
quote]

Russia has had ...... zero success so far :lol: :lol:
Mate be serious please. Since Russian involvement just over a year ago, Assad remains in power, more than 70% of Aleppo liberated, the rest about tofall and you say Russia achieved nothing!!!

By the way, you mention Kurds winning but left out Turkey !!
Mate you are utterly misguided. The war in Aleppo will soon come to an end unless of course the Coalition changes its mind and starts ....bombing the Russians!!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Dec 07, 2016 6:38 am

yes zero success so far. Plus, they are eyeballs deep in sectarian conflict. That is a disaster from which they will be unable to extract themselves, whereas the Coalition already has extracted itself and is now just supporting Kurdish Operations on the ground, and the impending offensive on Raqqa.

have you not worked it out yet? No.

Oh well, but let me give you a little insight on how things are done.

We don't particularly care about the sectarian conflict. We will continue to help rebels in Syria because that undermines the regime.

We will also control the oil and Gas Fields as well. $$$$$$$$$$$$

Did Pootin drop the ball or what?

As is per usual, fragile minds like yours Milti succumb to what they are fed by either the Russian propaganda media or the MSM. The Coalition doesn't reveal anything they don't want the public to know. THINK!

They certainly not going to be saying anything about the Oil and Gas. but was this the objective from day 1? I don't know, but as things turn out it certainly has become a clear objective now and many smart people who actually know how to use their brains can see the partition slowly coming to fruition. This is a Coalition Invasion and break up of Syria.

And do you know the smartest thing of all! it was an invasion with only about 1100 Coalition Troops, mostly Special Forces. And so far, Coalition has lost only 1 soldier.

And Russia also sees our point of view, and will be easily influenced as we approach closer and closer to his bases because no matter how close we get, he will never attack the Kurds or Coalition interests. Leaves only one avenue open to him.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby miltiades » Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:13 am

Paphitis wrote:yes zero success so far. Plus, they are eyeballs deep in sectarian conflict. That is a disaster from which they will be unable to extract themselves, whereas the Coalition already has extracted itself and is now just supporting Kurdish Operations on the ground, and the impending offensive on Raqqa.

have you not worked it out yet? No.

Oh well, but let me give you a little insight on how things are done.

We don't particularly care about the sectarian conflict. We will continue to help rebels in Syria because that undermines the regime.

We will also control the oil and Gas Fields as well. $$$$$$$$$$$$

Did Pootin drop the ball or what?

As is per usual, fragile minds like yours Milti succumb to what they are fed by either the Russian propaganda media or the MSM. The Coalition doesn't reveal anything they don't want the public to know. THINK!

They certainly not going to be saying anything about the Oil and Gas. but was this the objective from day 1? I don't know, but as things turn out it certainly has become a clear objective now and many smart people who actually know how to use their brains can see the partition slowly coming to fruition. This is a Coalition Invasion and break up of Syria.

And do you know the smartest thing of all! it was an invasion with only about 1100 Coalition Troops, mostly Special Forces. And so far, Coalition has lost only 1 soldier.

And Russia also sees our point of view, and will be easily influenced as we approach closer and closer to his bases
because no matter how close we get, he will never attack the Kurds or Coalition interests. Leaves only one avenue open to him.

Mate you make me laugh !! ZERO SUCCESS :lol: :lol:

More than 70% of Aleppo now controlled by the regime and you call this .....zero success :lol:

I notice that this is your first mention of oil and gas !! So this was the coalition's aim , here was I thinking it was regime change!!

You are approaching ,,,,his bases ? :lol: Come now you are sounding ridiculous !!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:21 am

miltiades wrote:
Paphitis wrote:yes zero success so far. Plus, they are eyeballs deep in sectarian conflict. That is a disaster from which they will be unable to extract themselves, whereas the Coalition already has extracted itself and is now just supporting Kurdish Operations on the ground, and the impending offensive on Raqqa.

have you not worked it out yet? No.

Oh well, but let me give you a little insight on how things are done.

We don't particularly care about the sectarian conflict. We will continue to help rebels in Syria because that undermines the regime.

We will also control the oil and Gas Fields as well. $$$$$$$$$$$$

Did Pootin drop the ball or what?

As is per usual, fragile minds like yours Milti succumb to what they are fed by either the Russian propaganda media or the MSM. The Coalition doesn't reveal anything they don't want the public to know. THINK!

They certainly not going to be saying anything about the Oil and Gas. but was this the objective from day 1? I don't know, but as things turn out it certainly has become a clear objective now and many smart people who actually know how to use their brains can see the partition slowly coming to fruition. This is a Coalition Invasion and break up of Syria.

And do you know the smartest thing of all! it was an invasion with only about 1100 Coalition Troops, mostly Special Forces. And so far, Coalition has lost only 1 soldier.

And Russia also sees our point of view, and will be easily influenced as we approach closer and closer to his bases
because no matter how close we get, he will never attack the Kurds or Coalition interests. Leaves only one avenue open to him.

Mate you make me laugh !! ZERO SUCCESS :lol: :lol:

More than 70% of Aleppo now controlled by the regime and you call this .....zero success :lol:

I notice that this is your first mention of oil and gas !! So this was the coalition's aim , here was I thinking it was regime change!!

You are approaching ,,,,his bases ? :lol: Come now you are sounding ridiculous !!


Yes zero success and soon you will be made to eat a lot of humble pie when you find out that everything I say will be very close to the mark, just like everything else in the past.

Milti, everything you and Robin Hood have said have backfired in your faces so far. I am amazed the 2 of you can still post here after all the embarrassment.

I always feel like saying the bleating obvious. Rebels still in control and you have to go house to house. You said Aleppo practically fell from December 2015, it didn't and I was here to rub your nose in it as I will be here when you chase all the shadows around Syria in your unwinnable sectarian conflict.

The only success so far has been from the Coalition. we have been dealing substantial blows to DAESH and we don't have to do it with a sledgehammer or by committing war crimes. our operations are such a success because we managed to get the support of the Sunni tribes. The regime does not have this support.

We also have all the Oil and Gas! Mmmmm

But tell me, what kind of victory do you think you are going to achieve when we control the loot? You will be left with Archidkia!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:30 am

Here is a clue for imbeciles!

We got the Oil and Gas! oops! $$$

but Why?

easy to answer!

The regime is just hell bent on holding onto power. Doesn't care if Syrians starve to death for as long as he is in the palace. In fact, he did starve thousands of Syrians to death.

Russia doesn't really care who is in power and who controls the oil and gas, they just want their bases and some form of stability and peace. Which can only be achieved with a comprehensive settlement.

The entire regime is pretty flawed and on false pretenses. So we get the oil because even that isn't important to them compared to power and bases. But it is still pretty damn important.

But the bad news for the regime, is that there will never be peace and stability in Syria. That part Russia does care about because that is a threat to its interests.

But in the end, until there is a comprehensive settlement, we proceed with our plans for partition. Once its done, its also off the table. No turning back, ever again.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby miltiades » Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:45 am

I cant believe you actually wrote this :
" Yes zero success and soon you will be made to eat a lot of humble pie when you find out that everything I say will be very close to the mark, just like everything else in the past."
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:53 am

You better believe it and there is one more thing you better believe.

no one knows the motives and motivations of all the 50+ rebel groups like the Coalition does.

Echelon my dear watson - 5 eyes global network. We have a lot of information on them and a lot of information on DAESH and we even track people 24/7 which we know are DAESH members. Australian Intelligence was following a DAESH Recruiter for many months in Turkey. For months! He has only just now been arrested, and who knows who else they follow. Not only that, but our networks are very much active in Syria as well and they are all Syrians.

The funny thing is, it was the same person they reported as dead to the MSM over a year ago, but there was never any report that he wasn't until they decided to arrest him. You are told what the Coalition want to tell you because it suits their operations. Nothing better than making the enemy believe that our target men are believed by us to be dead. Gives them a false hope of security. The problem is, the public are fed the bullshit those in power want to feed them. And you swallow the shit hook line and sinker.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 66678130dc

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/na ... 66678130dc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Prakash

We know EXACTLY who is affiliated to Al Qaeda and who isn't. And we also know, that the vast majority are not Al Qaeda affiliated and all of them are against DAESH and that includes the AL Qaeda affiliates who perceive ISIL's methods far too gruesome. Yes even Al Qaeda aren't as staunch as DAESH.

And you can guarantee that Hillary Clinton with her level of security clearances also knew, and that trump had no clue. in fact, he probably won't have any clue until after 20 January unless the give him his clearances before them. And you can also guarantee that Trump will not only agree with Hillary 100% but will in fact take a much harder line against Iran.

And it isn't a sticking point for the Coalition in a battle for survival.
Last edited by Paphitis on Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby yialousa1971 » Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:10 am

BREAKING: Aleppo’s Old City Now Fully Liberated by Syrian Army, Remaining Terrorists in Retreat

Image

21st Century Wire
SPECIAL REPORT

DAMASCUS – In a stunning development today, 21WIRE has received reports from on the ground in Syria that remaining ‘rebel’ militants have fled the Old City of Aleppo, even leaving behind a substantial amount of equipment and weapons – as the Syrian Arab Army advances into the remaining terrorist-held neighborhood in the eastern part of Syria’s largest city.

The following video shows early celebrations in the narrow streets of the Old Citadel. Watch
Video Player



SAA sources have confirmed that the ‘Old Citadel’ is now fully liberated, “with remaining pockets to be cleansed by tomorrow (Wednesday).”
21WIRE special contributor, Vanessa Beeley, is currently in Damascus, waiting to head to Aleppo. She had this to say on the situation and the news coming in from Syrian TV channels and statements from the Syrian Arab Army:

“Since I arrived in Damascus on Monday 5th December, there has been a simmering excitement from all members of society, a sense of impending victory in Aleppo. That anticipation seems to have been satiated tonight as news is coming in that the Syrian Arab Army is pushing home its advantage and sweeping clean, the remaining pockets of terrorist resistance against the SAA advances, supported by their allies from Iran, Russia and Hezbollah.

I met with Mother Agnes Mariam de la Croix today, in Damascus city centre to discuss her work supporting the Syrian State’s reconciliation projects which offer all manner of Amnesty and rehabilitation for armed mercenaries. During the meeting Mother Agnes made this statement:

“Between Syrians there are only solutions…no conflict. The conflict comes from outside Syria”

http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/12/06/b ... n-retreat/
Last edited by yialousa1971 on Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
yialousa1971
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6260
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:55 pm
Location: With my friends on the Cyprus forum

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:12 am

yialousa1971 wrote:BREAKING: Aleppo’s Old City Now Fully Liberated by Syrian Army, Remaining Terrorists in Retreat

Image


Bullshit!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby miltiades » Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:12 am

Paphitis wrote:
Get Real! wrote:It's available here...

US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt': Report

http://in.news.yahoo.com/us-backed-plan ... 48224.html


Wife is telling me that an attack on Syria is imminent.

Australian PM called off his election campaign because he was needed for high level discussions with the US. Australia is chair of the Security Council.

What they do admit is that they are unsure whether the chemical attacks on civilians are from Assad or the Islamist Rebels. It is possible that the Rebels have Chemical Weapons as well.

They believe it is likely to be Assad but they apparently need to gather more intelligence.

It is also unlikely they will have a mandate from the UN. Therefore, action will be unilateral or NATO.

Whoever is responsible for these Sarin Gas attacks needs to be pulverized. I can't bear seeing civilians, women and innocent children being exposed to such a terrible nerve agent. Absolutely sick.

Another thing that confuses me is the fact that the Rebels are backed by fundamentalist Islamists. Sometimes, it is better in helping REGIMES LIKE ASSAD, Qaddafi, and Mubarak maintain their power to keep everything under tight control and peaceful.

Simple fact is, some countries are just not ready for democracy and it is over rated anyway. Let's face it! Is the US, EU, or any other 'democracy' truly a democracy? Just because you get to cast your ballot does not mean you have a say.

Anyway, that was my one post per few days in this mental assylum because I'm off to Merkal land. The land of the Krauts that control Europe and screwed you buggers! They are democratic I will have you know because they have more money than you do and matter more than you do!

Not very consistent Paphitis are you mate ?
You clearly state that helping regimes like Assad etc is viable.

What made you change your mind? I too have always believed that nations in the ME can only be effectively ruled by a Dictator. I do not think your " consistency "measures up well here.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests