Paphitis;
Really? Then how come all we see is AK47s?
Because the US is one of the worlds biggest distributors of AK-47‘s, there is even a factory in California(?) that makes a semi-automatic version !
• As of 2007, a Romanian-made AK-47 could be purchased in the United States for $350, while other models can cost $1,395 — similar to the price of a high-end laptop computer. However, only semi-automatic models can be purchased legally in the United States.
• Covert actions by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency funnelled millions of AK-47s, as well as shoulder-held missiles, to Afghanistan in the 1970s in order to fight Soviet invaders.
• In 2004 and 2005, more than 350,000 AK-47 rifles and similar weapons were taken out of Bosnia and Serbia to be used in Iraq by private contractors working for the Pentagon — with the approval of NATO and European security forces in Bosnia.
• During the U.S. occupation of Iraq and the 2004-2005 period of the war, the Pentagon lost track of about 110,000 AK-47 assault rifles and 80,000 pistols given to Iraqi security forces. (Maybe history will repeat itself ?)
http://www.theglobalist.com/20-facts-mikhail-kalashnikov-ak-47/I know some rebels have been supplied TOW, MILAN and Javelin as the most advance weapons since 2015. it's only fair since barrel bombs and Chemical Weapons have been used against them wouldn't you say? Every man has a right of self defence.
Does that self defence apply to everyone or just those supported by the US? I think of Eastern Ukraine, Crimea, Grenada, Panama, etc. Barrel bombs? A bomb is a bomb is a bomb! Hellfire’s ...... what are they sparklers in disguise?
Chemical weapons ..... hypothesis until there is some tangible evidence to support it .... which so far seems to point more at the Saudi supplied terrorists!
If it were up to me, I would be supplying Ground to Air MANPADS like Stinger and Rapier! I would write To pootin, with love, from The Coalition!
Thank goodness then, that it isn’t up to you! You would get a missile up the jacksie for sheer impudence.
Read the bit by Saker ..... he knows his stuff .... you just spout conceit and propaganda! As Saker says, Russia could destroy every US/NATO vessel within 500km of this ‘
fleet’ and there would be absolutely nothing your coalition could do to prevent it ........ except start WWIII.
I think the US has sensible people running the operation ..... they may be misled by propaganda from their politicians ..... but the military just has to do as it is told and they generally do it well. All armies make mistakes but Putin refrains from continually decrying the US military for their mistakes ......... it is an inevitable consequence of the dirty game of war.
You say Putin ‘
postures’ ...... he ain’t got nothing on your performance ........ even if it was true, which I don’t think it is.