miltiades wrote:I couldnt have put it better my self:
"The large reality is that US options have been severely cut short by Russia’s military involvement in Syria. Any notion of a western-protected “no-fly zone” in northern Syria, aimed at creating a safe haven for civilians and rebels alike, has been made all but impossible. Such a thing could have made sense earlier in the war, but at this stage it would mean risking a wider military confrontation with Russia – which the Obama administration understandably cannot contemplate. What is unfolding in Aleppo may soon resemble the siege of Sarajevo in the 1990s – only this time with no relief in sight, and with much wider refugee consequences, including in Europe. If ever there was a symbol of western failure in Syria, this is it. Aleppo is already a stain on the UN. Now it is a stain on the record of the US administration too, however well intentioned it wanted to appear."
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre ... -the-world
Are you joking. Of course you can't put it better yourself. You are incapable of communication and chat. All you do is slew vitriolic nonsense. It's always the wine talking. If I ever have the displeasure of meeting you in person I can't promise you that I will not hurt you. Someone should have knocked some sense into you a long time ago. Pity your Father in Law is not alive. If I was in his shoes, I would toss you in the rubbish where you belong!
Oh and you like that do you? You like that it is "impossible" for a no fly zone to protect rebels and civilians.
You should be ashamed of yourself!
A no fly zone was an option a few months ago and could easily be established but there was no leadership and we couldn't work out where Lootin was coming from to begin with. In the start we actually thought he might help us with DAESH but that was all bullshit and lies.
You can't trust Pootin as far as you can piss, which admittedly is not too far in your case!