Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:What if we are willing to pay that price to bring this issue to close once and for all, the deal is land for recognition % are just formalities if the ideology is acceptable to all. (The % can be put before an international committee with expertise to settle the land disputes)
You dont seem to take into account what your partners want just what the GC want.
Hang on a minute VP... if, as you want, you walk away from past agreements that include a BBF settlement, then everything reverts to international norms, including any notion of "equal communities" or as you say "partners" cos there are no longer any agreements to be "partners" in.
Walk away from the table and abandon the past agreements by pushing for such things as "Taiwanisation" then things revert to an situation making past agreements null and void and the matter of self-determination for CY, the normal international standard, without the "equal communities"/ "equal partners" that form a part of the agreements you intend to walk away from, becomes one for a simple majority vote.
Please be more specific.
wyoming cowboy wrote:Vp how about you comply with UN resolutions and European courts of Human rights decisions, All Tc go back to their village of origin and Gc will do the same, the tc will be guaranteed their civil rights under the european courts, and of course all turk troops out,,,,The ROC will be a constitutional democracy a member of the eu un and maybe nato.....this is the best you will get as far as recognition,. giving you our lands to form a state is out of the question
boulio wrote:what does 12% APPLY TO:
a)total land area of ROC
B)TOTAL LAND AREA UNDER OCCUPATION
boulio wrote:its called dialogue you twit now crawl back into your chortikan cave and stfu
boulio wrote:good one
boulio wrote:what does 12% APPLY TO:
a)total land area of ROC
B)TOTAL LAND AREA UNDER OCCUPATION
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests