Very simplistic view to say the least Piratis.
Yes, we Cypriots are entitled to do as we wish with our island, and that has never been disputed by neither the UK, US or NATO. That is something they
can't dispute. In fact they recognise this and endorsed it throughout. There is a very big BUT in all of that! They will endorse it and give you everything you require as long as it suits their interests and in the 1950s it did not suit their interests to grant ENOSIS or independence. There were much larger forces at play, including the Suez campaign in Egypt at the time, so what was required was pragmatic realism.
Unfortunately that did not occur, so the Brits were quite happy to let us go off on our tangents and then shove the Zurich Agreement under our noses which granted them 2 SBAs. The fact of the matter is this, we could have been patient and asked for independence in 1964 and grant them some bases under lease. There would be no Zurich imposed constitution and Cyprus would not be divided today.
They were also quite happy for Greece to draft their Double Union plans, the ultimate betrayal, just to grant you your dream of ENOSIS. And since you believe that ENOSIS is your divine right then you can hardly blame the TCs for resisting this, something those "imperialists" exploited but even so, nothing comes close to the Double Union malarkey and coup when Cyprus had it all from 1963 and onwards.
And it would be interesting to see how many people were actually in favour of ENOSIS. You claim that the majority was but a Church sponsored plebiscite of Sunday worshippers hardly counts. Even some TCs voted in favour of that, so how genuine was it? Did you ask the TCs if they wanted ENOSIS with Greece? No you didn't. you didn't have to right because they are a minority! Does Bosnia spring to mind or are you so blind?
There are consequences for any actions taken Piratis. Self Determination is a universal right for all peoples, but what was required of us was to act responsibly! The Human rights of 600,000 people were second fiddle to the "imperialistic" Balance of Power" in the region during a time of intense hostility with Egypt and the developing cold war when everyone was becoming paranoid of a Soviet nuclear attack against Europe. Sure, the "imperialists" would never admit this, but when you are talking about the lives of millions of people and nuclear annihilation, then they would do anything to serve their interests and that does not exclude the Soviet Union by any stretch of imagination, because our "ally" could have done something about it but it chose not to. Again, their interests do not include Moscow, or Leningrad being turned into glass just like it is not in the interests of the "imperialists" for London, New York, Sydney and Washington to also be turned into glass at the same time.