Get Real! wrote:GreekIslandGirl wrote:Get Real! wrote:Sotos wrote:I read quite a bit of it and there is nothing disputing how Hellenic is Cyprus. I got bored trying to find such dispute and you can't even quote it to me. She just disputes HOW Cyprus was hellenized in the ancient times.
No no no... you should’ve skipped the first section where she lays down the well known popular story.
And proves why the 'popular' story is popular. Because the Hellenisation of Cyprus has an overwhelming amount of historical evidence to support it.
That's nonsense! It takes a 12 year old to tear it to pieces! I myself as a non-historian have posted dozens of flaws over the years.
And your arguments are about as sound as those of a semi-educated 12 year old.
Snippet for you from your helpful historian, the lovely Leriou:
Besides pottery, the Swedish excavations unearthed more categories of evidence supporting the
Hellenisation hypothesis. At Lapithos-Kastros a new type of tomb of clearly Mycenaean origin was discovered:
chamber tombs with long dromoi that were dated to the beginning of the Iron Age on the basis of the pottery
they contained (Gjerstad 1931, p. 61; Gjerstad 1933, p. 267; Gjerstad 1980, p. 44-45; SCE I, p. 172-265). A
relatively large number of similar chamber tombs would later be located at various sites all over the island and
subsequently constitute one of the strongest arguments for a Mycenaean colonisation. Moreover the sanctuaries
at Aghia Irini and Idalion with their small roofed shrines seemed completely different from the earlier Cypriot
cult places and reminded Gjerstad of the domestic sanctuaries in the Minoan palaces and houses (Gjerstad 1933,
p. 267).