This is about a section in the near mystical Report of the Secretary General on UN Operations in CY in the Spring of 1965 published on 10 June 1965.. ref'd at the UN as S/6426.
Mystical cos it's proved very hard over the years to track down the original at the UN.
So that for a long time the only ref to it was in a report submitted to the Human Rights section of Council of Europe by the Republic in 1999. Naturally given it came through the Republic, this source and the document weren't seen to be reliable.
This appears here... http://www.humanrights.coe.int/Minoriti ... prus/B.htm
... and from there, this is a controversial section...
9. The Secretary-General of the United Nations in 1965, described the policy of the Turkish Cypriot leaders in this way: "The Turkish Cypriot leaders have adhered to a rigid stand against any measures which might involve having members of the two communities live and work together, or which might place Turkish Cypriots in situations where they would have to acknowledge the authority of Government agents. Indeed, since the Turkish Cypriot leadership is committed to physical and geographical separation of the communities as a political goal, it is not likely to encourage activities by Turkish Cypriots which may be interpreted as demonstrating the merits of an alternative policy. The result has been a seemingly deliberate policy of self-segregation by the Turkish Cypriots" (Report S/6426 10.6.65).
Which tells us that in the view of the UN Secretary General of the time, U Thant, that there was a policy of Self-Segregation by the TMT/Volkan/Turkish Leadership.
... but without an original source, the para's value is limited.
The original source document (and it's a huge document, with an awful lot of other info that tells us a good deal about this troubled time, so well worth a look at the whole lot) contains this section, section 106. Here is a screenshot...
Word for word (apart from the first line which is given in French and translates as "The Turkish Cypriot leadership has adopted..." , it's the same as submitted by the Republic to the Council of Europe in 1999. The Republic's version reported to the CoE is therefore vindicated.
For those who wish to see the original, there isn't a straightforward link to it. A search of the UN Documents Centre is required...
So put the search term >> S/6426 << into the search box at this UN Link >>> http://www.un.org/en/documents/ods/ (The English version appears 4 down)