Piratis wrote:How did that happen? In one foul swoop, the indigenous of Cyprus became instant Hellenes
Piratis wrote:First define which are the indigenous people of Cyprus? Many different groups came to Cyprus in different times from different places. I asked you a question earlier about the Chirokitians and the the people of pre-historic Sotira and you avoided to answer.
Cyprus became hellenic because Greeks were the majority and they gradually assimilated any group that came before or after them in Cyprus.
I am not avoiding anything Piratis. I did not answer because your assertion is daft to say the least, and I am not mentioning you avoiding to answer one of my questions. Those peoples we call Khoirokitians and Sotirans were the original first inhabitants of Cyprus, much like the Aborigines were the first inhabitants of Australia. Later, it was not just Greeks that came, but the Phoenicians who invented Linear B thus laying the foundation for the Greek Alphabet. That does not make them Greek anymore than it makes the Aborigines Englishmen. They are Cypriots. A completely separate people, and no, these people didn't vanish into thin air, unless you Greeks want to openly confess to a genocide!
It is like you saying that when the Brits came to Australia, the aborigines became Englishmen! They are Australians!
Piratis wrote:And it is like you are saying that the people of the Kangaroo Island can only be of the "Kangaroo Ethnicity" and can not share the same ethnicity as that of the people on the mainland. How did you come to the conclusion that each island should have a separate ethnicity? There are 1000s of inhabited islands in the world and only a handful at most have an ethnicity that is exclusive only on them.
Australia is one nation and has its own ID thank you very much. It decided a long time ago to let go of any attachments to the so called mother.
Cyprus on the other hand has never been a part of the "Greek" nation.
In WW2, the island of Malta was an important Naval Base that supported the allied defence of Tobruk. It was of far greater strategic importance than Cyprus, and furthermore, you overstate our island's importance in the year 2012 when the US 5th Fleet has a huge base in Bahrain.
Piratis wrote:When Malta was strategic the British kept it. They gave it up when it stopped being strategic. Cyprus continues to be strategic which is why the British want to keep the bases here.
Actually, you will be surprised. Cyprus isn't that strategic in this day and age. The Brits, Yanks can set up bases just about anywhere. Yes you name it. From Turkey, to Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Bahrain, UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait et al. So how strategic do you think you are?
And what difference does it make? If we were smart, we would have given them exactly what they wanted without the need for any fight, and they would have granted us independence, if not in 1960, then in 1965 and without the Zurich Constitution. And this stupidity I blame on the so called Hellenes such as yourself, who are too stupid to see past your noses.
Those days are long gone when the islanders were brainwashed from Greek text books and the Church.
I don't think so, Cypriots are always ridiculing Greeks just like they should!
Piratis wrote:What you think and what is the truth are two very different things. The fact is that Cypriots are as Greek today as they have always been. When Greece won the Euro a few years ago we had the biggest celebrations we ever had in Cyprus during my lifetime.
I bet that most Cypriots would want to knock you out if you said that to their faces! Yes 40,000 thousand people on the streets does not classify as the majority being Greek.
There were 50,000 on the streets of Melbourne as well, but that does not mean that most Melbournians are Greek!