The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby bg_turk » Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:29 pm

cypezokyli wrote:FYROM didnot exist at the time so it has nothing to apologise for, when it comes to this matter...its clear isnt it? :)

But the citizens of the Republic of Macedonia and their ancestors existed at the time, and crimes were comitted against them by the Greek regime.

Anyway, Greece may keep on its attitude, the major UN countries including Russia and USA, and the great majority of the Balkan states have recognized the Republic of Macedonia by its constitutional name.
Greece may continue to play its little games and continue to brainwash its public with historical pride and superiority complex, I couldnt give a damn. But which other country would do a similar thing? Imagine Canadian and USAians arguings who is more american, it would look so ridiculous.This kind of problems stem from extreme shauvinism, and I must say greeks shauvnism is one of the most sickening I have ever seen.
Last edited by bg_turk on Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bg_turk
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Postby bg_turk » Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:00 pm

Last edited by bg_turk on Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bg_turk
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Postby Kifeas » Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:20 pm

bg_turk,

May I ask what is the bottom-line of all your postings in relation the Macedonian issue?

What is it that you want to say? Are you claiming that the national borders of the all the today’s Balkan states should be reshaped in favour of the establishment of a greater Macedonian state, along the entire territory of what used to be the historical Macedonia?

What is the point of continually bringing up the wrongdoings that took place during the Balkan wars, which occurred almost 100 years ago? Is it only the Greeks that forced populations out of what is now a part of the Greek Macedonian district? There were no Greeks that during those wars have been forced to move into Greece by the Bulgarian and Serbian nationalists? I know entire towns and villages situated in what today is part of Bulgaria that were also forced to south and into Greece.

The fact of the matter is that in what used to be the area of historical Macedonia there was no homogenous population with one commonly shared ethnic identity. It was a mixture of various people. As a result of the emerging collapse of the Ottoman empire, those countries whose populations where more homogenous and they had a more developed and cohesive national base, rushed into the areas of what we call Macedonia in order to gain advantage, claiming historical rights but also because they had people of their own kin in those territories. This is true for the Greeks as much as it is true for the Bulgarians as well as the Serbs. The end result is what we have today. Should Macedonians, or better all the people that used to live under the areas that we call historical Macedonia, had a single and separate national identity their own and perhaps have revolted against the ottomans in a unifying manner and with the aim of establishing their own separate Macedonian state, like the Greeks and the Bulgarians had, then most likely the situation on the map today would have been different. The case was not so. There was no such thing like a common unifying Macedonian national consciousness that was shared by all or even the majority of the people living in its territories.

Today, all these countries recognise and respect each others borders. Bulgaria and Greece, likewise Serbia and Greece, have the best of relationships. The same can be said with the country claiming to represent the entire Macedonia people and which is for the moment recognised by the UN with the name FYROM. Greece doesn't claim any of its territories, as far as I know. I am not sure about the opposite though.

Are you pumping all these information in the forum, in order to suggest that there should be a border re-definition of the entire region, 90 years after this has been determined and that all countries have moved on with their lives? What is it that you want to prove? I fail to grasp your arguments.

There is a problem with the name. This is true. I gave you some arguments reflecting Greece position on this matter. Why you do not comment on them and instead you keep pumping maps and slogans for something that there is no way we can reverse today but can only feel sorry and which occurred one century ago?
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby bg_turk » Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:39 pm

Kifeas,
What is it that you want to say? Are you claiming that the national borders of the all the today’s Balkan states should be reshaped in favour of the establishment of a greater Macedonian state, along the entire territory of what used to be the historical Macedonia?

No! I simply want Greece to respect the rights of its slavic minority and stop violating RoM right to call itself whatever it wants. Hopefully the ECHR will pressure Greece to respect the rights of its minorities as in the case of OURANIO TOXO AND OTHERS v. GREECE


There were no Greeks that during those wars have been forced to move into Greece by the Bulgarian and Serbian nationalists? I know entire towns and villages situated in what today is part of Bulgaria that were also forced to south and into Greece.

Of course there were some greeks that were forced to move, but definintely not on the same magnitude. I have actually been very interested to learn about greeks who lived in Bulgaria, and I was speaking to one bulgarian-speaking greek recently to learn about his perspective. He now lives in northern greece, and his animosity towards bulgaria was because of the actions of the bulgarian army in northern greece during the second world war, not because a great number of greeks were ethnically cleansed. Basically no large scale greek movement occured during and after the Balkan wars. There were not many greek towns, only a few small communities along the balck sea. When I was on the seasaide this summer I talked to one old Bulgarian lady and she told me that the greeks in Ahtopol and some other black sea resorts who had left after the first balkan war.
But this is not nearly on the same scale as the crimes committed by deportations and cleansing comitted by the greek state.

The fact of the matter is that in what used to be the area of historical Macedonia there was no homogenous population with one commonly shared ethnic identity. It was a mixture of various people. As a result of the emerging collapse of the Ottoman empire, those countries whose populations where more homogenous and they had a more developed and cohesive national base, rushed into the areas of what we call Macedonia in order to gain advantage, claiming historical rights but also because they had people of their own kin in those territories. This is true for the Greeks as much as it is true for the Bulgarians as well as the Serbs. The end result is what we have today. Should Macedonians, or better all the people that used to live under the areas that we call historical Macedonia, had a single and separate national identity their own and perhaps have revolted against the ottomans in a unifying manner and with the aim of establishing their own separate Macedonian state, like the Greeks and the Bulgarians had, then most likely the situation on the map today would have been different. The case was not so. There was no such thing like a common unifying Macedonian national consciousness that was shared by all or even the majority of the people living in its territories.

Thank you for at least acknoledging that macedonia is not exclusively greek. WHy doesnt modern greece accept the mutliethnic heritage of the region, and tries to violate the rights of its minorities?

Today, all these countries recognise and respect each others borders. Bulgaria and Greece, likewise Serbia and Greece, have the best of relationships. The same can be said with the country claiming to represent the entire Macedonia people and which is for the moment recognised by the UN with the name FYROM. Greece doesn't claim any of its territories, as far as I know. I am not sure about the opposite though.

Whatever the history is and whatever is the way you interpret it, it is a fact that the Macedonian nation and ethnicity are reality in todays world and the name "Macedonians" is the only name they identify with (A name supported by every goverment (except Greece and Cyprus), international organizations, encyclopedias etc. Macedonia never asked Greece to change the name of its northern province. Macedonia never asked Greeks to stop using the name Macedonia. Greece was the one who started all the problem.

Are you pumping all these information in the forum, in order to suggest that there should be a border re-definition of the entire region, 90 years after this has been determined and that all countries have moved on with their lives? What is it that you want to prove? I fail to grasp your arguments.

There is a problem with the name. This is true. I gave you some arguments reflecting Greece position on this matter. Why you do not comment on them and instead you keep pumping maps and slogans for something that there is no way we can reverse today but can only feel sorry and which occurred one century ago?

I pumped those maps for those who denied that greece had comitted ethic clansing over the region. There will be no border redefinition in the Balkans. In fact if it were in my power i would opt for all borders to be dropped. I am simply against the extreme nationalism and shuvinism that the greek state is promoting over the issue that is all.
User avatar
bg_turk
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Postby Tony-4497 » Thu Oct 27, 2005 2:39 am

bg_turk

Slavs in FYROM are lucky that they are dealing with Greece (and not another country) with respect to this issue.

Had they tried something similar (i.e. stealing the name of a large province and explicitly stating territorial claims - even tought at schools) with a serious and proud country like Turkey, the reaction would have been very different. Turkey would have walked in the next day, wiped all of them out and indefinitely occupied the area to ensure "peace" in the region.

Unfortunately (and luckily for them), they are dealing with a Greece that has lost all self-respect and balls and allows herself to be pushed around even by countries like FYROM.. next thing we will hear is that Alexander the Great was a slav..
Tony-4497
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:09 pm
Location: Limassol

Postby bg_turk » Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:48 am

Tony-4497 wrote:Had they tried something similar (i.e. stealing the name of a large province and explicitly stating territorial claims - even tought at schools) with a serious and proud country like Turkey, the reaction would have been very different. Turkey would have walked in the next day, wiped all of them out and indefinitely occupied the area to ensure "peace" in the region.


That is very untrue. There is no coutnry in the entire world but Greece that would refuse to recognize, impose economic embargoes and actively lobby against a country just because of its name. I know of no single precedent to this in the entire human history.
User avatar
bg_turk
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Postby cypezokyli » Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:41 pm

bg_turk even though u said some sensible things , i have to say these posters are just provoking and u dont get to any sensible solution continuing like that.
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby cypezokyli » Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:53 pm

some time ago a greek or gc loged in with a name "i kypros einai elliniki" which means cyprus is greek. i told him the name was provoking and that he should change it. ofcource he didnt. he wanted that i should first prove him historically wrong, which was absolutely out of the point. the name was provoking for some gcypriots and all tcs.
now bg_turk the same works for you.
u r just provoking with no reason at all and by that there is no chance u can convince anyone for the point want to make.
end.
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby bg_turk » Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:00 pm

sorry it was childish of me to put so many posters in one place. I removed the posters. But I will keep the ones in my signature if you do not mind.
User avatar
bg_turk
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Postby cypezokyli » Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:50 pm

to be honest it is still annoying
both politically but also this constant change of colours somehow distracts the eye and makes it difficult to concetrate on what u actually said. thats how i see it

in any case thanks for removing all those posters
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest