Dirigent wrote:So u think that u r smart or u r greek!?
who`s not a greek is a barbarian!a!!
good morning Demosten and yours 10th Phillipiki`s!
Filip II is a barbarian! -told Demosten
after that comes Alexandar and told to all macedonians- I want to see the Greeks under my legs and how they pray to me!
and that hapends at Hayroneya
nice to meet u
u r very boring nation (i meen the greeks)
It has not been established with an absolute degree of certainty that the ancient Macedonians where just another one of the many Greek tribes that settled in the south Balkans, Asia Minor and eastern Mediterranean. There is a huge amount of evidence suggesting that they were such a people. There is also some evidence, far less than the one suggesting the above, suggesting that they were only a cousin people (certainly a non distant one) of the other Greek tribes.
The truth of the matter though is that ancient Macedonians were an overwhelmingly hellenised group of people. Their names, their traditions, their worshipping gods, their mythology and their associations suggest only that. They had a spoken dialect, which resembled in many ways to other Greek dialects of the time, but in many other ways it sounded different. Their written language however was a form of ancient Greek, like the other Greek tribes. It is a fact that although they could perfectly understand the rest of the Greeks when they spoke among themselves, the rests of the Greeks would have had much more difficulty understanding them when they would speak among themselves.
A similar analogy, although not so strong like that of the ancient Macedonians, can be made with the case of the ancient Trojans.
The fact that in many cases they fought against each other, means absolutely nothing. Spartans fought against Athenians, Athenians fought against Thebans, etc, etc. In those times the concept of a Nation-state, as we find it later in the middle ages, was non-existent. Instead we had city-states and /or kingdoms formed around the concept of city-states.
The fact that they might have been called Barbarians by some (not all) of the ancient Greek historians, also doesn’t suggest much. The term Barbarian, as it was used by the ancient Greeks, was attributed to all those that spoke another language (non-Greeks) but also to all those that spoke a not so purified and understandable Greek dialect, mainly to the Athenian Greeks. The term “barbarian” etymologically comes from a constant sound of “bar-bar-bar,” which denotes how a non-understandable language sounded in the ears of ancient Athenians. It is only later that the term “barbarians” was associated with the description of people who were backward and /or primitive.
On the other hand, the fact that ancient Macedonians were permitted to participate in the ancient Olympics, something which could only be allowed to Greeks from all the city/states/Kingdoms of the Mediterranean and Black sea regions, suggests that they were regarded and treated in many ways as just another Greek tribe, something which the ancient Macedonians themselves had no problem accepting, irrespective of the possible existence of any prejudices towards them.
Nevertheless, to suggest that the ancient Macedonians were a Slavic people and /or of Slavic origin, or that they had any relationship whatsoever with other Slavic tribes, is more than a joke to say the least.