Viewpoint wrote:Hermes wrote:Viewpoint wrote:CBBB wrote:
Why would Kikapu, a Cypriot, want to come and visit the Anatolian peasants (like yourself) that are the majority in the occupied areas of his country?
To tell heathens like you that you cannot have the north.
The north is legally RoC and EU territory so Turkey cannot have the north either. Isn't that its problem?
Turkey has the north and theres nothing you have done to date that will help you get it back, it is time you realized that you have to agree a partnership along BBF where you rule the south and we rule the north.
So what you are saying is, the GCs can't have the north EVEN if they did agree to a partnership in a BBF. That being the case, why agree to a partnership in a BBF at all.
But you are correct, even though you let it slip out unconsciously, that ANY partnership in a BBF or any other partnership, it would mean the GCs losing the north completely as well as a chance of losing the south as well. Isn't what your beloved Annan Plan was all about that you are still wet-dreaming of it coming back?
In any case, one cannot run a country as a business and partnership, so I do not expect ANY partnership to ever take place in Cyprus. Proportional Power sharing perhaps, but a complete outright 50-50 partnership will NEVER happen.
In any case, Turkey is in the north illegally as an occupying power trying desperately to change its ownership. The land still belongs to the RoC and the EU. If Turkey hasn't managed to claim the north outright for herself before 2004 when Cyprus became member of the EU as well as 100% of Cyprus, the future looks very bleak that Turkey will EVER manage to keep the north since 2004. What's the point in trying anyway, specially it has proven that Turkey has no Oil and Gas between her shores and Cyprus, and specially since all the Oil and Gas is in the south of Cyprus.
Karma can be a real bitch sometimes.