Hermes wrote:bill cobbett wrote:So it was pressing that Block 12 was developed quickly to catch up with the Israelis in a poss shared reservoir. May explain what some have condemned as the "rush" to drill Block 12.
Thanks for the explanation, Bill. So it wasn't chosen because it had potentially the largest reserves based on seismic data? The other blocks could yield as equally large or greater reserves?
On the strength of their known finds in Israeli waters and on the strength of their access to the adjoining Israel data, think Noble knew Block 12 was a good prospect before they invested in the Block 12 seismic data.Think there were also logistical benefits, with such things as joint pipe-lines, for Noble to get Block 12 to augment their interests in adjoining Israeli fields and the obvious very important political reasons for CY in developing Block 12 with Israel.
As to the prospects in other blocks... sorry mate ... have no hard info on the other blocks, other than to say that the interest from other oil/gas companies may be an indication. They do seem to have been very willing to make over mega-money for the seismic data for the other blocks. Blocks which are geologically identical and an extension of Block 12 to the westwards... so it may well be oil and gas all the way to Crete.
How much of a geological gamble are these firms taking? Well, these oil/gas firms will have knowledge of the geology in the other blocks. It is public knowledge.
Have a look at this report from the US Geological Survey to give an idea of the potential if Israeli/Egyptian finds are replicated in geologically similar CY waters. It doesn't talk about billions of cf of gas... it uses units in Trillions.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2010/3014/pdf/FS10-3014.pdf