kurupetos wrote:supporttheunderdog wrote:kurupetos wrote:When the Greeks discovered Britain tvhe local savages had many tattoos covering their bodies. Pytheas named them Britons because of this.
Greeks discover Britain....?
Pytheas was a fucking tourist.
Tin had been traded for hundreds of years,...
All Pytheus did was follow a well established trade route.
The Amesbury Archer had made the journey from Mainland Europe, probably the Alps to Stone Henge, probably 700 years before, and Stonehenge was already old, even then.
Places like the neolithic Orkney sites and Stonehenge were built by an organised society, in Stonehenge's case ultimately to a plan, possibly based around the winter solstice sunset, possibly for cult/funeral rites purposes. The Ness of Brodgar contains the largest stone buildings if its type and time, in Nothern Europe.
Christopher Columbus was a bloody tourist then...
Time to revise Encyclopædia Britannica, you stupid dog!
y
Well if you cannot understand the less than subtle difference between someone following a route that had been followed for several thousand years by likely thousands of traders, and that may at the early stages have been overland, or at most coastal passage, close to land, as opposed to someone setting off on a totally uncharted route out of sight of land for many days, then you are more stupid than I thought.
As it is, the Vikings certainly reached a different part of the Americas by a different route, about 450 to 500 years before Columbus, Bristol Fisherman may have been fishing near the Newfoundland coast in about 1470, say 20 years before Columbus, and an Irish Monk may have beaten them all, if one interpretation of the Brendan Saga is correct.