Here is what I wrote in 2008, before natural gas and when Turkey and Israel were still good friends and nobody could think of a possible way where Turkey would lose the support of the Americans and find herself in the losing side of a regional war.
Also, if war is needed, I never talk about a 1 on 1 war of Cyprus VS Turkey, since no matter how much the balance of power will change Cyprus will never have the power to win such war. I am talking about a bigger regional or world war, like those that are made a couple of times each century or so, where Turkey and Cyprus will be involved. Greece for example won back Rhodes and the Dodecaneese after WWII when Italy which occupied those islands until then, found herself on the loosing side of that war. Again, there are many such examples in our history.
In the future, with Turkey torn between Secularists and Islamists, as well as between Turks and Kurds, I find it very possible for Turkey to find itself in the loosing side of such regional/world war.
I believe that if Islam takes over Turkey and at the same time the Turks remain as arrogant as they are today, plus the fact that you have the much more willing to comply Kurds sitting on a ton of oil, and if you consider the anti-Islam sentiment that keeps rising in Europe and the USA, then many, currently unpredictable by most, things can happen in our region. The change in balance of power that I talk about is not just words. It is something that keeps happening, and will happen again.
This doesn't mean that the events happening this period is the chance we have (or rather "should have") been waiting for, but they showcase how things can change in just a few years that can make possible what before was thought as impossible.
I will repeat what our policy on the Cyprus Problem should be:
1) We should maintain the Republic of Cyprus with sovergnity rights over the whole island. These sovergnity rights might not mean much today, but will mean a lot under a different balance of power.
2) We should continue the negotiations with the Turkish side but without any concessions on principles such as human rights and democracy. If a solution is found then it should be a real solution that will make Cyprus a normal democratic country with equal Cypriot citizens and no racist divisions. A bad solution such as Annan plan is worst than no solution, as not only it will create more problems than the few it could solve, but would make it far harder for us to take advanatge of future changes in the balance of power to liberate the north part of our island.
3) We should help others to keep Turkey out of EU and push her as far from the West as possible and at the same time support the Kurds in their struggle for freedom. A regional conflict is the most possible way of liberating the north part of Cyprus and these two factors are important if we want to be on the winning side.
Of course Cyprus is tiny and our policies alone are not enough to determine the future balance of power. But other factors, such as the fact that most Europeans don't want Turkey in EU, combined with the Turkish arrogance and pride which might not let them accept something less than a full EU membership, might help us achieve our aim eventually.