Cyprus-Forum.com

[Hermes]

Today, we offer them electricity, our hotels are better, our land in the TRNC is visited by those Greek Cypriots whom are sick and tired of the lies of their politicians, and our "Northern Cyprus" is gaining ground as a form of new "Taiwan" everyday.

You really are a deluded fool.

[denizaksulu]

Which hotels are better? Those owned by TCs and staffed by TCs or the ones owned, run and staffed by Turks?

Anyway I digress from the topic, but responding to the above.

Yes, we should help all Cypriots when in trouble and without being asked too.

[Kikapu]

Today, we offer them electricity, our hotels are better, our land in the TRNC is visited by those Greek Cypriots whom are sick and tired of the lies of their politicians, and our "Northern Cyprus" is gaining ground as a form of new "Taiwan" everyday.

You really are a deluded fool.

I sometimes think our friend, MrH, is related to Davutoglu, based on the posts he writes here on the CF.

We all know what the American officials think of Davutoglu, don't we?

[Viewpoint]

In times of trouble we should help each other.

I agree. Lets have everyone return back to their properties and for them to do as they wish with it.

I agree where it is physically possible or compensation will have to do but of course this cannot be done on its we need to resolve power sharing and security.

[bill cobbett]

In times of trouble we should help each other.

I agree. Lets have everyone return back to their properties and for them to do as they wish with it.

I agree where it is physically possible or compensation will have to do but of course this cannot be done on its we need to resolve power sharing and security.

Can we ask you please VP when you talk about security nowadays ... is this a ref to personal and community safety?

I ask cos if you are not talking constitutional guarantees as per 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, then as long as a strictly limited number of your friends in the TA confine themselves to the northern zone, in a very low profile, out of sight sort of way, it may be an acceptable compromise... but they must not step over the zonal boundary.

[Viewpoint]

I agree that any security guarantee should only cover the north state any TCs who wants to risk living in the south state should know that they are not under the security blanket but at the mercy of GC authorities.

[bill cobbett]

I agree that any security guarantee should only cover the north state any TCs who wants to risk living in the south state should know that they are not under the security blanket.

May well be a way forward out of the impasse on Security.

[Viewpoint]

I agree that any security guarantee should only cover the north state any TCs who wants to risk living in the south state should know that they are not under the security blanket.

May well be a way forward out of the impasse on Security.

This maybe an area where TCs can compromise.

[bill cobbett]

I agree that any security guarantee should only cover the north state any TCs who wants to risk living in the south state should know that they are not under the security blanket.

May well be a way forward out of the impasse on Security.

This maybe an area where TCs can compromise.

OK... it's a pretty decent compromise, but you'll appreciate that the people in the southern zone will want to maintain the NG for their own safety?

[Viewpoint]

I agree that any security guarantee should only cover the north state any TCs who wants to risk living in the south state should know that they are not under the security blanket.

May well be a way forward out of the impasse on Security.

This maybe an area where TCs can compromise.

OK... it's a pretty decent compromise, but you'll appreciate that the people in the southern zone will want to maintain the NG for their own safety?

Sure we have never been against their demands for security.