Cyprus-Forum.com

[Viewpoint]

VP YOU SAY 25% no less.

Would you agree to 18% and partition with however strict armes controls?

Turkey wants 100% or nothing.

Nothing is what she will get.

If what you say is correct which i doubt you are 100% right.

[boulio]

KIkapu i am well aware of turkeys motives and aspirations however would t/c in the north if they could agree to a partition on a 82-18% split ?

[Viewpoint]

KIkapu i am well aware of turkeys motives and aspirations however would t/c in the north if they could agree to a partition on a 82-18% split ?

I personally would agree but not in the EU.

[Kikapu]

VP YOU SAY 25% no less.

Would you agree to 18% and partition with however strict armes controls?

Turkey wants 100% or nothing.

Nothing is what she will get.

If what you say is correct which i doubt you are 100% right.

Which one,

a) that Turkey wants 100% of Cyprus

or

b) that Turkey will get nothing

[Kikapu]

KIkapu i am well aware of turkeys motives and aspirations however would t/c in the north if they could agree to a partition on a 82-18% split ?

I personally would agree but not in the EU.

Don't worry, because neither will happen, so it's not even worth talking about it.

[Viewpoint]

VP YOU SAY 25% no less.

Would you agree to 18% and partition with however strict armes controls?

Turkey wants 100% or nothing.

Nothing is what she will get.

If what you say is correct which i doubt you are 100% right.

Which one,

a) that Turkey wants 100% of Cyprus

or

b) that Turkey will get nothing

a is wrong
b is right for 63% of the island.

[Kikapu]

VP YOU SAY 25% no less.

Would you agree to 18% and partition with however strict armes controls?

Turkey wants 100% or nothing.

Nothing is what she will get.

If what you say is correct which i doubt you are 100% right.

Which one,

a) that Turkey wants 100% of Cyprus

or

b) that Turkey will get nothing

a is wrong

In that case, you do not understand what the AP was all about and you understand even less what Turkey means when she states that she will choose Cyprus over the EU.

b is right for 63% of the island.

Cyprus is 100% and not 63%. The whole 100% is in the EU, therefore either Turkey will get 100% or nothing at all, because she has never talked about just settling for 37%, because she never mentions the "trnc". My bet is, she won't get anything at all.

[antifon]

You are missing if you are not following the discussion here:
http://www.todayszaman.com/news-250503- ... grity.html

Read all the comments from the beginning.

[Viewpoint]

Kikapu you are totally wrong Turkey could have had the whole island in 1974 but she choose 37% rubbishes your theory really.

[Kikapu]

Kikapu you are totally wrong Turkey could have had the whole island in 1974 but she choose 37% rubbishes your theory really.

VP, you are totally wrong. Turkey couldn't even take a piss without the Americans say so in '74, otherwise they would have been in Cyprus way before 1974, like in 1963 for example. Aside from that, had Turkey taken the whole island against the Americans wishes, there is a good chance, Turkey would have suffered at least 40,000 dead Turkish soldiers by now to the GC underground fighters. They would have met worse case disaster than what the British experienced from a bunch of Ragtag GC fighters. You must give Turkey more credit than what you have, for them not wanting to commit suicide in the hands of the GC freedom fighters and even worse, turning the Americans and the British against them for going beyond the agreed 37% between themselves and Greece. Turkey couldn't even convert the 37% of the north to make it into her own territory officially, and that was prior to Cyprus becoming a EU member. That's what the Annan Plan was designed to do, for Turkey to take hold of the whole island without firing a shot. Instead, the EU took the whole island without firing a shot with the help from the GCs. Turkey has zero chance now with or without the TCs help to take any part of the island, let alone the whole island.