Paphitis wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Paphitis wrote:jahitty wrote:Intersting proposal Mr Cobbet, although I dont agree, you pay us period, depending on how we invest in green technologies. The EU/US could have a stake in building and developing a green industries in Cyprus.
What has my nationality got to do with it?
Well, you obviously are not Cypriot!
Cyprus can invest in renewables and drill for its own resources!
Reh Paphitis, the bottom line is that sums must be done. Sums that involve the hard cash value of the oil reserves and the less tangible value of environmental protection and strategic considerations.... and if there's a chance that CY's interests are best served by keeping it in the ground, whilst still preserving ownership, in return for some kind of retainer, then these calculations must be evaluated, we can't just dismiss them out of hand, ....particularly as the future is Green.
Who is going to pay this retainer? Will it be the Energy hungry EU, US, Israel, or the developing China and India!
I don't know Bill, but other countries like the US, Russia, Canada, Australia, the Arab States, China and what not are ripping resources out of the ground as fast as they can.
They must have done their sums!
The retainer... the EU is the obvious candidate to pay one.
Given the environmental consequences of an oil spill off the southern coast and given the increasing world-wide shift to greener energy sources, then these calculations must be done and evaluated for the CY example, in an EU context, one where the EU's (in other words essentially GB's North Sea), oil reserves are on a sharp decline.
If the calculations work in CY's interests then leave it in the ground, but if they don't then go ahead and get it out.