Pyrpolizer wrote:denizaksulu wrote:First I would like to congratulate our friend Pyro in the way he has been debating the problems faced. Pyro has shown skill and gentlemanly behaviour towards all he has debated with. I wish all were of such good quality (debates). Needless to say that this also has been shown by his TC or in his words Kıbrıslı opponent (was it Erolz)?
Pyro, it seem from your post above, that you have objections to BBF; under the present situation on the ground how do you think the problem might be solved. I also have in mind what Bananiot is saying too. Can we or anyone seriously change what is happening on our beloved island. I tend to think of Bananiot being a pragmatist; no sensible person likes what is happening ESP with the settlers and the above mentioned 'Turkification' of our island
Regards
Denizaksulu
Oh you now made be blush my friend Deniz from Aksu.
Erolz3 is just a Kibrisli friend who's wavelength seems to match with mine. I believe he is more of a researcher of truth than an opponent in debates. I like him. I think he deserves more respect from some people in here.
Anyhow, I never hidden the fact that my number one preference for a solution is the return to the 1960 constitution AS WE ARE NOW and work things from there.This is an immediate solution, and removes all the negatives from the lives of the Kibrislis caused by their living isolated in an unrecognized state. It gives them direct flights, direct trade, and defacto civilian and mostly administrative control of the existing occupied area.
I understand that I am a tiny minority in this view, like some Kibrislis who hold the same view are. (e.g Sener Levent et al). You see for most Kibrislis that would equal return to pre- 1974 and an ANATHEMA. I believe they are wrong but then again i am just a little minority in this view.
So my next option is the BBF, which I support without having any fantacies of what it really is. However like I said above the BBF ranges from very mildly undemocratic without permanent derrogations to very very undemocratic with lots of permanent derrogations. I don't support just ANY eventual form of BBF i only support the first type.
There is also a problem with this BBF, because the leaders have never clarified from the very begining the extend to which there will be violations of human rights and derrogations from Aquis, and having not done that the negotiations are and will be never ending.
ANY SOLUTION be it BBF or my proposal to return back to the 1960 agreements will put an end to the Turkification of our island. From there on we could give incentives to the settlers to leave as well as incentives for the Kibrislis to come back to their homecountry,
So to summarize my proposals are:
Either Immediate return to 1960 contstitution and take it from there TOGETHER (Kypreos and KIbrislis) for a final solution
or
Clarify the BBF extend of derrogations on human rights and their time limit before any further discussions. If this is FINALIZED and AGREED we will have a solution 1 year after (at the maximum).
Thank you for making your position clear as to your preferences. I also concur. Also the ambiguities with ref. to the BBFs must be sorted as you mention. This bit is where I hate politicians. CONNIVING and/or AMBIGUOUS.