londoner wrote:Wikipedia definition is clear enough
Cypriot may refer to:
Something of, from, or related to the country of Cyprus
A person from Cyprus, or of Cypriot descent.
good point.
ZoC wrote:Cap wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There is no "Cypriot" nation we lost that opportunity in 1963.
What planet you living on?
I've got a passport that says it does.
leave it cap. he's a turkey cypriot.
Cap wrote:ZoC wrote:Cap wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There is no "Cypriot" nation we lost that opportunity in 1963.
What planet you living on?
I've got a passport that says it does.
leave it cap. he's a turkey cypriot.
But his statement is false.
With or without the TC's, the RoC exists.
Cap wrote:ZoC wrote:Cap wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There is no "Cypriot" nation we lost that opportunity in 1963.
What planet you living on?
I've got a passport that says it does.
leave it cap. he's a turkey cypriot.
But his statement is false.
With or without the TC's, the RoC exists.
Cap wrote:Viewpoint wrote:There is no "Cypriot" nation we lost that opportunity in 1963.
What planet you living on?
I've got a passport that says it does.
Viewpoint wrote:You have the freedom to think and believe what you want but I must also be allowed to the same freedom to feel like a Turkish Cypriot. The unity and bonding that is necessary to build one people as in "Cypriot" just did not happen in Cyprus, this is now being exploited by GCs to get us on board its just to little to late..where was the idea in 1963?
wyoming cowboy wrote: the tc's left and went into their makeshift enclaves from some villages, the tc withdrew a government that they signed onto because they were promised taksim by their motherland turkey a crystal clear violation of the zurich agreement......therefore the tc and the pseudo state will never have any sort of legitimacy and will eventually succumb to the ROC and awknowledge the ROC's representation of the whole island
erolz3 wrote:wyoming cowboy wrote: the tc's left and went into their makeshift enclaves from some villages, the tc withdrew a government that they signed onto because they were promised taksim by their motherland turkey a crystal clear violation of the zurich agreement......therefore the tc and the pseudo state will never have any sort of legitimacy and will eventually succumb to the ROC and awknowledge the ROC's representation of the whole island
If you can only see the past in terms of what you want to believe or want other to believe happened rather than what actually happened, then your predictions for the future are rather empty I would suggest.
Sotos wrote: But it is the predictions of TCs that were shown to be empty. The "trnc" was declared 28 years ago but no country has recognized it. If you could go past the Turkish propaganda then you would be able to see why! It is mind boggling how brainwashed some TCs can be to actually believe that what happened in the past gives them the right to ethnically cleanse us and steal our lands. If anything the opposite is true. We deserve a part of Turkey as compensation for what the Turks have done to us since they invaded our island
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests