Quattro I am not saying that both sides to not carry some blame. I have repeated on here and elsewhere constantly that both communites bear responsibility and blame, though I do argue to what degree in the various time periods. We can (and do) carry some of the blame but that fact does not show that nothing was stolen from us. Its a different argument / discussion. Soto's claim that I was responding to was that nothing was stolen from us (TC community) by the GC community.
I disagree, thats all. If the rights granted to us were unjust and unfair, then they should have been removed or challenged legaly. They were not, they were taken from us without any valid legal due process. To say that no legal due process was needed to remove them from us because they were 'unfair' or 'unjust' doesnt wash with me, sorry. Not if you beleive in legality and the rule of law. If something is unjust then challenge it in courts. If the courts uphold the unjust, then change the laws.
DT I don't want to go over old ground all over again. However , refusing to approve budgets is a vaild and legal form of protest, used around the world, especially in the US between Senate and Presidency. The municiplaites issue should have legaly been solved by the constitutional court but Makarios refused to abide by this legal bodies rulings. Withdrawing from government is a valid and legal form of protest, used the world over and does not legaly abrogate your rights in doing so. The TC leadership formaly requested a return to government under its legal rights granted under the 60's agreements as documented by the UN. This has been covered so many times before and this round and round that same discussions is on reason I seldom post these days. One example here
http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... ht=#199501
The point I am trying to get across is that simply telling TC that nothing was stolen from them, when plainly they believe something was will never move us forward. We did have rights under the 60's agreements, these agreements were considered legal by the entire world at the time they were drawn up and agreed. These rights were removed without any legal due process, national or international. The only way they could be considered to have been removed legaly is via legal due process. Saying they werent fair in the first place thus we can remove them without any valid legal due process is not how it works. Not then and not today. It just does not matter how fair or unfair agreements signed may be, one party can not just decide they are unfair without legal due process and expect the other party to say 'oh thats ok then'.
Anyway clearly we are no further forward than we were years ago. Continue to believe that nothing was taken from the TC community in 63-65 if you like. My personal belief is that choosing to believe that can only hinder our chances of sorting out the mess today but maybe I am wrong or maybe it makes no difference what any of us believe.