B25 wrote:Kikapu wrote:B25 wrote:Kiks, I don't agree with you, sorry. The whole thing went too easy for a random hi-jack and crashing.
What I find most strange is how the building conveniently fell straight down not causing it to tilt and destroy neighbouring buildings. The whole thing went like clockwork for an attack of this magnitude.
With all the homeland security the US has, they have a department made up of every combination of the english alphabet, and still these nobodys manged to do it??
Come on, just who do they think they are fooling??? Birkturk maybe, not me or the millions of others who understand just how dirty the CIA play.
They would kill their own to have a reason to do what they want.
Definately an inside job.What I find most strange is how the building conveniently fell straight down not causing it to tilt and destroy neighbouring buildings. The whole thing went like clockwork for an attack of this magnitude.
There is a very simple explanation as to why the buildings came straight down and not sideways. It's called GRAVITY, which only works one way, at 90° straight down.
If it were to have been a controlled demolition on the buildings on 9/11, which I have witnessed couple of times in Las Vegas where old hotels were brought down to build bigger ones in it's place, the explosives are placed at the base of the buildings to weaken the structure, and once that is done, then gravity takes over with the help from the weight of the building itself, which comes straight down. Did the twin towers collapse from bottom up or top to bottom. You will find that they in fact collapsed top to bottom. To support the conspiracy theory for this to happen, each floor of the twin towers would have needed to have explosives placed in them and each floor level to explode in split second from each other to destroy the whole building. That's not what happened. The tops of the twin towers basically collapse into itself floor by floor withing the outer steel cage of the towers. Once the burnt areas of the towers got weakened by the buckling steel frames caused by the heat, the top of the buildings came crashing to earth floor by floor in rapid speed, very close to the speed of gravity.
As to what happened to WTC 7 building is a mystery, which can be perhaps explained by the shaking of the ground caused by the falling twin towers, which may have caused damage to the foundations to weaken it. Perhaps it was brought down intentionally after the fact if it's foundations were weakened by the falling of the twin towers. If the twin towers weekend the WTC 7 building foundations and it was no longer a safe building, it doesn't really mater how it came down, controlled explosives or not. As far as I know, no one was killed in WTC 7 building.
As I've stated, the Bush administration knew there were going to be hijackings. What they did not know was, the intentions of the hijackers. Hijacking planes doesn't require too much brain power. Once the planes were3 hijacked, crashing them into building didn't take much planning either. Everything happened too fast and was over within a short time. I personally believe that Flight 93 that crashes in Pennsylvania, was more than likely shot down by US jets to prevent it from reaching it's target, but you will never get the US to admit that. It sounds better that those who died on board died as heroes in saving lives on the ground with the "Lets Roll" call. If the US did shoot Flight 93 down, they did the right thing.
Just the hijacking of the planes and crashing them into the ground would have given the US enough excuse to invade Iraq by blaming Saddam Hussein for the loss of couple of hundred passengers on those planes. There is no way the NeoCons would have let 9/11 happen with the way it happened. The cost has been way too much for all the oil in Iraq to make the justification if the NeoCons were behind 9/11. The US economy did not suffer as the results of the Housing Bubble in 2008, but it began back in 2001 right after 9/11.
Nope, still don't agree. We will just agree to disgaree here.
Don't under estimate the yanks, they do what it takes, no matter what happens.
They used this excuse to pass laws they would never normally be allowed to, rule by fear tactic.
You said it yourself, they knew about the attack, but waited it out, just goes to prove what I said.
No, B25, I said the government knew about the pending hijackings and not the attacks. There is a difference. Listen, I'm one of the most anti Bush people you will come across, but I can't hang the whole events of 9/11 on Bush. The NeoCons wanted to go to Iraq as per "PNAC" (Project for the New American Century) and they needed an excuse to do so, and the hijackings and would be killing of Americans on the planes would have been enough. What they didn't know was, Bin Laden had bigger things planned that the Americans did not see it coming, despite attempts being made to blow up one of the twin towers few years earlier. Bin Laden in effect outsmarted Bush, which was no big task if I may add. Just as Tassos Papadopoulos outsmarted Turkey and her supporters on the 2004 Annan Plan with an OXI vote when they thought victory was at hand. Sometimes shit happens, plain and simple and the terrorist on 9/11 got very lucky with their outcome, to say the least.
