GreekForumer!
Let me put the record straight regarding the rubbish you keep throwing at us - using Wikipedia as your source (!?)!
Firstly, Wikipedia is reputed to be not a good source for reference for arguments as also put forward and argued by many (more learned) GCs in this forum. You have failed on that one to start with.
Your second failure to convince anyone comes from the fact that, you persistently select isolated bits (even from Wikipedia) with no due attention or reference to the rest of the material it contains. So allow me to correct you referring you back to your beloved Wiki by quoting this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Kurdistan
Let me make to you and any other fool who believes Eastern Turkey is "ancestral land of Kurds" (as you put it). The land could have been ancestral to Sumerians or Hitites but never to Kurds! No historic map or writing of Kurdish origin has ever been discovered in the area - so how does that make it ancestral Kurdish land? - what Kurdish culture are you talking about?
In 1919 Kurds declared an independent Kingdom. The link above expresses an unrecognized so called "Kingdom of Kurdistan" 85% in Iraq, only with an area smaller than the size of Cyrpus in Eastern Turkey. A mountainous barren part of Turkey where even the foxes had refused to stay! If Kurds believed their "Kingdom" had ancestral claim to a bigger land , then why did they not construct a larger map?
But when
The army of the Kingdom of Kurdistan was called the Kurdish National Army. Barzanji was defeated by the British in July, 1924, and in January 1926 the League of Nations gave the mandate over the territory to Iraq, with the provision for special rights for Kurds. In 1930-1931, Shaykh Makhmud Barzanji made his last unsuccessful attempt.
Following this, In 1925 they changed their map and tactics to:
The second Kingdom of Kurdistan was attempted in southeastern Turkey with Sheikh Said Rebellion in 1925 and only lasted 3 months before being put down by the Turkish army. The rebellion was initiated by Sheikh Said of Piran who was reported to have been assisted by tribal elements from Syria.
I attract your attention to "Syria" element here who supported the idea and at the time were arch enemies of Turkey!
Many years BC when Asia minor was under Roman and Greek rule, the whole region was shown as "Armenia" and included what was later claimed to be "Kingdom of Kurdistan". So after the Armenian terrorism against Turks was killed off, someone started the idea of a "Kurdish" land in the same area!
If you really must know, the whole idea of introducing Kurds into the equation, came from an Imperialist historian called George Rawlinson, who, in the 19th century decided to assume that, many civilizations that existed in Eastern Turkey were Kurds(?). However, if one looks at the names and history of these many tribes, there is no such local evidence recorded in writing, or any artefacts remains discovered to show a common language, culture, religion or tradition!
When will you understand - just like the Armenian Myth - Kurdish problem was artificially created and perpetuated by the enemies of Turks existence in the area (like Greeks for instance) whom to this day are unashamedly supporting their terrorist activities.
As for the number of Kurds in Turkey today, the reason is far from the place being their "ancestral land". You better look in the direction of Kurd bashing by Iraq and Syria, which resulted in Kurds crossing the Turkish border in their hundreds of thousands over the last decades of 20th century (and before!), for safety AND decided to stay there since! Characteristically having 6-10 children (even more with most of them having 2 wives) the buggers multiply like rats. So now they "claim" to be well over 10 million in Turkey, you think they are entitled to a republic?
Let me ask you something. If the TRNC gave financial help and encouraged families to have 6-7 children each and within a decade TC population reached half of the GC population, will you agree to us having half of Cyprus then???
I suggest you take the pink glasses off, and have a more careful look at the Kurdish problem, from a wider historic and political perspective.